PL charge City for alleged breaches of financial rules

[Blue_eyes]

We'll end up with more statues than fans!

#emptihad

Is this what people are referring to when they say "statute of limitations", the number of statues allowed??

Hope we havnt passed ours or its 116th incoming.

 

[cheekybids]

They're not leaks though, it's just chancers stating "a source told them". It literally can not be a leak and not true at the same time. That would be misinformation at best, made up bollocks at worst.

Daniel Sturidge was banned for telling his mate he was signing for a team he didn’t sign for so maybe you can leak & be wrong.

 

[Len Rum]

Is it possible therefore that the respected KCs on the Panel could find us not guilty of anything shall we say serious but just guilty of non compliance and incorrect grass cutting. However their penalty for these minor offences could in fact trigger a much greater fine / points deduction / etc.?

In other words the KCs do it correctly but the penalty is what the PL want?

Yeah. This concerns me.
IMO Everton have been docked ten points for ' incorrect grass cutting' (excellent phrase).
If say we are judged on the same basis and with possibly a bit of an extra penalty for not trimming the edges of the lawn, could end up with an even bigger charge?

 

[Spili's City]

Yeah. This concerns me.
IMO Everton have been docked ten points for ' incorrect grass cutting' (excellent phrase).
If say we are judged on the same basis and with possibly a bit of an extra penalty for not trimming the edges of the lawn, could end up with an even bigger charge?

I’m concerned too, I seriously doubt their independence. They will be pushed to hand out severe penalties even with the flimsiest of charges subjectively proven eg non cooperation
This is why I asked what recourse through the courts we have if any of the above happens. Or are we just a sitting duck ?

 

[chaddblue]

Yeah. This concerns me.
IMO Everton have been docked ten points for ' incorrect grass cutting' (excellent phrase).
If say we are judged on the same basis and with possibly a bit of an extra penalty for not trimming the edges of the lawn, could end up with an even bigger charge?

I’d be shocked if Everton don’t get all or most of those points back on appeal. There’s been a major backlash against the severity of the punishment. As everybody keeps telling us there precedent so that would only be a good thing for us

 

[jimmygrimblesboots]

The shit will hit the fan when we do disprove all the charges , Gas Mk10 piss boiling

 

[BobKowalski]

Why would it?

A season without City would generate big interest.
City fighting their way back would generate big interest.

As long as exciting things are happening, which they always are, the premier league will remain massively attractive to viewers and advertisers.

It would be hell of a story…the rise, then the fall and the banishment to the wilderness…but the redemption and the return to slay those that have wronged us would be box office and what is the Premier League other than a soap opera.

Netflix would eat it up.

 

[KS55]

Is this what people are referring to when they say "statute of limitations", the number of statues allowed??

Hope we havnt passed ours or its 116th incoming.

The statute of limitations is the last one in a line of statues. By common law tradition, it wears a flat cap to demonstrate its status as the end of the line, “the cap”.

 

[Holcombe bloo]

Panja was David Gills woman at the MEN.

It would be nice if somebody nicked both their mobiles

 

[1961_vintage]

City are only dominant cause they are doing nearly everything right on and off the pitch, it wont last forever. Once Pep leaves, a noticeable drop will happen.

They are banking on this.

Which is why Pep marked their card.

"Do the fuck whatever you like with these charges - the worse they are the longer I will stay".