The Colonel
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 10 Jul 2009
- Messages
- 2,038
I can't believe that you're all trivialising this!There's a guy works down the chip shop swears he's Elvis
Does he call it a muffin or barm?
I can't believe that you're all trivialising this!There's a guy works down the chip shop swears he's Elvis
This may be worth a listen - me v Nick Harris on the excellent Unofficial Partner podcast...
This may be worth a listen - me v Nick Harris on the excellent Unofficial Partner podcast...
Was his bike outside the chippy?I can't believe that you're all trivialising this!
Does he call it a muffin or barm?
This may be worth a listen - me v Nick Harris on the excellent Unofficial Partner podcast...
People like Harris will never concede - this is his raison d’etre. He showed his naïveté several times - particularly around single “out of context” emails and how commercial settlements arise in the real world. Harris floundered a little at certain times but manfully kept trying to plough the same furrow. I’d say a very good points win for Stefan.I’ll get a chance to listen to this tomorrow. Are you happy with how it went? Did Harris concede to your greater knowledge?
Stefan explained it expertly this morning on TS emphasising the word profit. It's a shame that there are so many Muppets in the media chatting shit about FFP when they are utterly clueless and the masses lap it up.There's a lot of confusion about Chelsea as many of their fans and the media think they need to make 100 mill worth of sales. They actually need to make 100 million profit on sales which is a totally different kettle of fish. All by June 30th. They also don't seem to factor in the current book values of players. Even if they manage to offload Lukaku for example it will be at a loss to his book value.
It will be The Great Escape Part II if they manage it.
clutching at straws springs to mindThank you Sir, a very enjoyable hour and I know a little more, Mr Harris appeared to be out of his depth on several occasions.
It said on talksport they faced 9 charges 7 still guilty of 2 they are now notFrom today's Mirror..
Pretty simple: Everton faced a single charge, and City have 115 different charges focused on a far longer duration of time with a myriad of different legal complexities. A decision on the punishment for Everton's second alleged breach is expected to arrive long before there is a resolution to the City case.
but how many sub sectionsIt said on talksport they faced 9 charges 7 still guilty of 2 they are now not