PL charge City for alleged breaches of financial rules

This is true, but as I said after the headlining of the Talksport discussions: you sleep with dogs, you catch fleas. We all know what Talskport are about and we all know what Harris is about.
At least Stefan had the balls to step into the lions den and fight City's corner.
 
I don't think he's referring to you as a whistleblower, he's been throwing that around for a few years now.

A cyinic would say it lends credibility to his accusations without him ever having to produce evidence of the person existing.
Stefan has a rising profile and has put forward very credible points in the various social and conventional media platforms. A cynic might ask if any other parties might stand to gain from "encouraging" some of the claims and accusations that have been made ..... especially those which are aimed at questioning his knowledge and credibility ..... in other words are we hearing these accusations from the organ grinder or the monkey
 
If there was a whistle blower, we will have acted with the knowledge that they had one and plead guilty had they had any evidence. We haven’t done, which leads me to believe there isn’t one.

The email apparently was unearthed after CAS, but unless the PL can prove that our owner has directly paid Etihad’s sponsorship bill to us, then it proves nothing and Etihad don’t need to show their books to the committee. Again, if they had the evidence, we wouldn’t have plead not guilty. This again makes me believe that isn’t enough evidence to convict.

I could be wrong, but that’s my take.
I was certain that the email that you are referring to was discussed at CAS.
 
& yet unemployed. He’s created a whole persona as a Football Financial Investigative journalist, the best team in the world are facing 115 charges & he still is unable to get a job.

What a pathetic ****…..

Look at his website... on the masthead proudly claims 'Specialists Sports Website of the Year' ...that was 10 years ago in a category that has only ever had two winners and the SJA now list as Discontinued categories/on hiatus!

SportingIntel_website.jpg
 
If there was a whistle blower, we will have acted with the knowledge that they had one and plead guilty had they had any evidence. We haven’t done, which leads me to believe there isn’t one.

The email apparently was unearthed after CAS, but unless the PL can prove that our owner has directly paid Etihad’s sponsorship bill to us, then it proves nothing and Etihad don’t need to show their books to the committee. Again, if they had the evidence, we wouldn’t have plead not guilty. This again makes me believe that isn’t enough evidence to convict.

I could be wrong, but that’s my take.
But that's worrying too... if the UEFA case hinged on the hacked information... If this email was 'unearthed' after the CAS ruling does that suggest the hacking was still going on?
For me, the questions shouldn't be being asked of City, but rather how can a major football club be allowed to be violated in this way, with seemingly no recourse?!?
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.