PL charge City for alleged breaches of financial rules

waspish said:
How can Neville keep making snide remarks that our turnover isn't real? In effect accusing Man City of cooking the books!? It's was on the overlap the fans one! That's 2/3 times now he has accused or mentioned that when talking about clubs revenues he classes his teams as the one that's making the most!
Click to expand...
Same with Joey Barton on his podcast, says it’s well known in football circles we inflated sponsorships to circumvent FFP and we voted for more strict financial limits to stop Newcastle/Villa etc joining us at the top table. You feel like your pissing into the wind with the constant lies and besmirching of our club
 
Blue Maverick said:
Can I ask the non cooperation charges how has this come about, did we not supply information for accounts or are they asking for more that we don’t have to supply?
Click to expand...
If taking a week to answer a text from your ex wife who ran off with the milkman is non cooperation, then City are guilty as charged
 
The fact January's transfer window spending was 84% lower than last January should tell the PL that what they are doing is choking the bandwidth. Which dribbles down the slippery slope to the champ & leagues 1&2 who’s clubs will eventually start to hit financial icebergs due to the lack of money in the game
 
domalino said:
@projectriver I see Matt law is suddenly very concerned about Chelsea failing PSR today.

Hasn’t he been telling you that you’re wrong about Chelsea’s finance for the last 6 months?
Click to expand...
Quite a few people falling into line now. The Blueco numbers released this week are incredible and have the revelation that Mount was pushed into 22/23. This is significant because they need him to pass 22/23 but it leaves a huge hole in 23/24. I've always simplified the issue to being £100m short on profit. But they are far shorter than that.
 
waspish said:
How can Neville keep making snide remarks that our turnover isn't real? In effect accusing Man City of cooking the books!? It's was on the overlap the fans one! That's 2/3 times now he has accused or mentioned that when talking about clubs revenues he classes his teams as the one that's making the most!
Click to expand...

And in the same breath talk about how City is a better run club in every aspect.
 
ganganvince said:
Didn't it mean the big 5/6 could in effect vote things through
Click to expand...

Yes and we were one of them. It was nine clubs that were proposed to have special voting rights, we were one of the big six and then Everton, West Ham and Southampton.

www.bbc.co.uk

Project Big Picture: What is it and how would it work?

The greatest potential shake-up in English football since the Premier League was formed has been proposed. What does it involve?
www.bbc.co.uk www.bbc.co.uk
 
meltonblue said:
Yes and we were one of them. It was nine clubs that were proposed to have special voting rights, we were one of the big six and then Everton, West Ham and Southampton.

www.bbc.co.uk

Project Big Picture: What is it and how would it work?

The greatest potential shake-up in English football since the Premier League was formed has been proposed. What does it involve?
www.bbc.co.uk www.bbc.co.uk
Click to expand...
cant help but being suspicious of the PL and the other top clubs,there is always another motive hidden away that apears when things are signed up
 
Why is it the red teams laying out a new plan when it’s obviously gonna be in there favour. the biggest winners in the league should have the biggest voice or are we up to something bigger behind the scenes
 
marco said:
cant help but being suspicious of the PL and the other top clubs,there is always another motive hidden away that apears when things are signed up
Click to expand...

Yup. The PLs model of being owned by the clubs themselves was always going to be a recipe for disaster.
 
eyalluvitt said:
The fact January's transfer window spending was 84% lower than last January should tell the PL that what they are doing is choking the bandwidth. Which dribbles down the slippery slope to the champ & leagues 1&2 who’s clubs will eventually start to hit financial icebergs due to the lack of money in the game
Click to expand...

I've not known any industry that would actively prevent investment.
 
argyle said:
I've not known any industry that would actively prevent investment.
Click to expand...
simple approach:

1.Stop investment, club can’t grow.
2.Base spending on commercial strength.

Result: only 2/3 teams can win the league. The product is protected; the end.

No more challengers allowed. City’s name ruined and Newcastle or anyone else can forget about having money to spend.

Racket simple as that.
 
Last edited:
It’s obvious that the whole thing is starting to fall apart and is likely to unravel very quickly, possibly in the next few months. It is a fuck up of truly epic proportions and turning the league into a fucking farce.

The worry is that our charges get caught up in that collapse leaving an intentional and tedious question mark against our name. Just hope on this occasion the club is more strident in defending its position, and pointing the finger, than it has been hitherto.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Unread Posts

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top