PL charge City for alleged breaches of financial rules

hammocity said:
i did a Law module as part of my HNC in Business Studies around 47 years ago, it was only basic law but I still remember this (I think).

“Defamation is the publication of a false statement which causes a person to be subjected to hate, ridicule or contempt, or causes them to be shunned by right thinking members of society generally”

(@gordondaviesmoustache have I got the above right, it was a long time ago).

The last part of that definitely does not apply to the lunatic media who are trying to destroy our reputation with their never ending click bait journalism that’s so transparent to us but not our opposition.

We should go after these wankers and hopefully there is some truth in the latest leaks.
Click to expand...
You can remember that exact quote from 47 years ago?
 
Odd socks said:
Now Netflix are reaping the benefit of working with us perhaps they could do a series on "How the cartel failed".
Don't start with City but with Chelsea who first moved in on them before City used the template to do it even better.
Until the rest of the football community outside of the cartel understands what they did to prevent anyone getting a slice of the pie then we will be regarded as cheats who used our financial clout to get out of jail so to speak.
Most non cartel fans have never invested interest in understanding what this is all about and the cartel fans just cherry pick to suit who heals their pain, along with the shortcomings of their team's.
Just accepting innocence will not be enough, chasing down people who called us cheats is small time (correct but time consuming), what people need is facts presented to them on why we are innocent and explanation of how we managed to stay ahead of the game by being smarter.
I look forward to binge watching the failure of cartel to out smart City due in part to their greed.
Click to expand...
 
Dribble said:
It's a fruitless exercise. Yesterday I responded to a bloke who called us "oil money cheats". I asked him if he knew what the 115 breaches were? I then explained that almost all of the alleged breaches had been thrown out by CAS, so what were the PL thinking by coming after City again over the same allegations, using the same hacked evidence?

He responded with "STILL oil money cheats". What's the fuckin point? They've bought into the Red Top Mafia & Spuds narrative, & concluded we're guilty without even knowing what the breaches are.

It's frustrating, but fuck the lot of em. When this is all finally over & done with, today's newspapers will become tomorrow's packing material. The mud will continue to stick, but I suspect this was the least worse outcome for the Cartel Clubs.
Click to expand...
I respond with ‘thick as fuck’ :)
 
stan bowles said:
Scousers are very weird as we all know. One confidently denying on 'X' any possibility of City being found not guilty with the ground breaking assertion that "City have techniques to wriggle out of any charges [brought against them]..."

Hey everyone, City "have techniques".

Cults, the lot of them.
Click to expand...
There the last set of fans to assume guilt
 
Stoned Rose said:
You can remember that exact quote from 47 years ago?
Click to expand...
Yep, we had to learn several phrases/laws, as I said it was 1 of 6 modules for the HNC, I used to have a good memory but our tutor advised us to write them down on cards, put the question on one side and the answer on the other. Shuffle them, then pull one out, read the question then try to recall the answer. It was learning parrot fashion really but I passed so it worked for me.

One of the others I remember was a case, Donoghue v Stevenson, which was used as a precedent law of Tort, the defendant was accused of being negligent in not preventing a snail to get into the Plaintiff’s ginger beer bottle.

I maybe an FOC with a somewhat dodgy memory these days but something’s do stick, I guess it’s the same with the Ryan Giggs song, “illegitimate”, that’s probably knocking on for 30 years old but we all remember it :-)
 
Invisible Man's Bandage said:
The hearing isn't imminent according to Martin Lipton on Stefan's Twitter....October / November. Judgement issued months later according to Stefan.

Just Masters being a useless **** as always
Click to expand...
Quoting my own post from the other day but Martin Lipton replied on Stefan's Twitter saying the hearing is October/November. He clearly hasn't got the same information as Prestige Car Sales :)

(Just trying to temper some excess giddiness on here)
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Unread Posts

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
✖
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.