PL charge City for alleged breaches of financial rules

blueparsman said:
but they looking at 6x not 5 so not much diff to wot we are allowed to spend at mo. wot it will do is slow us down if our growth continues financially or we make sure the lowest team grows too. Its stopping the gap get bigger. Rightly or wrongly ??? to me it shud be up to the other clubs to grow financially. why restrict well run clubs
Click to expand...

OntarioBlue said:
Just one more thought. Won’t this just drive the “big“ clubs in the premier league to look at a European Super League again ?
Click to expand...
If it restricts our investment at City it could increase the pace of development at the CFG clubs.
 
eastmanc said:
Like I said before the Premeir League are desperate to fuck us up, but in doing so they are going to cause irreparable damage to the top flight football in England.
Click to expand...
Isn't it a coincidence that City now have the biggest revenue in England, yet might not be able to spend it. I'm shocked, it's so fucking transparent, the only silver lining is that the rags are getting caught in the crossfire this time.
 
Invisible Man's Bandage said:
Dan 'Cuntface' Roan reporting about the new proposed regs from outside the Swamp rather than Ashton New Road on the 6 O'Clock News. Only mentioned us after saying the Rags were against it as well as us and Villa. No mention of the charges.
Click to expand...

Hope that cunts had one of the legal watch your step letters.
 
Burtonblue said:
La Liga and the rest of Europe must be laughing their bollocks off.
I mean…….talk about making yourself uncompetitive!!!
What a bunch of chumps the PL are.
Ycnmiu.
Click to expand...
Yep.
Not in terms of the chumps league but the respective league's of serie a , bundesliga and the Spanish league the past 5 years or so they fell off a cliff in terms of neutrals watching them and getting revenue.
All the top league's round Europe smell blood with how the Premier league have treated their best team and cutting their nose off to spite their face just to suit american owners and the smear campaign against city.
 
I think there are like 13 or 14 PL clubs where revenue was less than 250m for season 22/23. for 10 clubs it was even under 200m.
to tell them they cant spend more than 500m a year for wages, amortization etc, for most of them their total expenditure doesnt reach half of that amount which is more than just wages, player amortization and agent fees.
they will laugh as they were never going to spend 500m. not even close. only exception maybe Newcastle. even Villa wouldnt spend that much imo albeit they had high losses recently.

so this doesnt effect them much and probably happy to put the boot in for the top clubs.

then we have 6 clubs left (Big Six) with about revenues between 450 and 700m and 3 of them didnt vote for it. why Newcastle voted for it not sure, but overall I feel like Saudis changed their focus more on the Saudi legue instead following through with the big plans we hard of at the takeover. cant blame them with the amount of spider web regulation for PL FFP, its a nightmare now to turn this Newcastle side into title winning or CL powerhouse.
they had 250m revenue for 22/23, may hit 300m for 23/24 but thats it, next year no CL, so could drop back again and they spent most of their money imo so this next summer either will be a quiet one or have to sell a big name.
and even Ashworth fucked them off, after he brought them the disaster Tonali deal haha.

so only really Spurs, dippers, Arse are the ones who affected positvely from these rules, as their sweetspot maybe just around 400/500 m spend per season. they dont want to spend more than this going forward and happy if they can make sure the 3 other clubs with similar or better reveues cannot spend more either.

Villa with a bit of ambition recently can now see through what thes rules really good for, keeping them where they are and making sure that if they reach CL on the back of a good season well these rules can make sure they still cannot really ride this wave and will be a rare one off...
 
Very Strange for city and united to be on the same side of an issue.

I still have a sneaking suspicion there’s a bit of cosying up behind the scenes and the upper echelons of both clubs actually want to get on well and support each other earn more money that ever before, despite everything.

On the bright side if they are it means the charges will be completely thrown out, or we wouldn’t be making new friends
 
Damanino said:
I think there are like 13 or 14 PL clubs where revenue was less than 250m for season 22/23. for 10 clubs it was even under 200m.
to tell them they cant spend more than 500m a year for wages, amortization etc, for most of them their total expenditure doesnt reach half of that amount which is more than just wages, player amortization and agent fees.
they will laugh as they were never going to spend 500m. not even close. only exception maybe Newcastle. even Villa wouldnt spend that much imo albeit they had high losses recently.

so this doesnt effect them much and probably happy to put the boot in for the top clubs.

then we have 6 clubs left (Big Six) with about revenues between 450 and 700m and 3 of them didnt vote for it. why Newcastle voted for it not sure, but overall I feel like Saudis changed their focus more on the Saudi legue instead following through with the big plans we hard of at the takeover. cant blame them with the amount of spider web regulation for PL FFP, its a nightmare now to turn this Newcastle side into title winning or CL powerhouse.
they had 250m revenue for 22/23, may hit 300m for 23/24 but thats it, next year no CL, so could drop back again and they spent most of their money imo so this next summer either will be a quiet one or have to sell a big name.
and even Ashworth fucked them off, after he brought them the disaster Tonali deal haha.

so only really Spurs, dippers, Arse are the ones who affected positvely from these rules, as their sweetspot maybe just around 400/500 m spend per season. they dont want to spend more than this going forward and happy if they can make sure the 3 other clubs with similar or better reveues cannot spend more either.

Villa with a bit of ambition recently can now see through what thes rules really good for, keeping them where they are and making sure that if they reach CL on the back of a good season well these rules can make sure they still cannot really ride this wave and will be a rare one off...
Click to expand...
Villa are the big standout, on the face of it, you would think they would be for this. I guess they have genuine ambition but they need to grow their revenue massively moving forward.
 
TheThirdDeano said:
Very Strange for city and united to be on the same side of an issue.

I still have a sneaking suspicion there’s a bit of cosying up behind the scenes and the upper echelons of both clubs actually want to get on well and support each other earn more money that ever before, despite everything.

On the bright side if they are it means the charges will be completely thrown out, or we wouldn’t be making new friends
Click to expand...
Well they took one of ours on board.
 
Do we as a club not have bigger things to worry about than a spending cap to close the make believe gap?

Existential threat for the survival of our great club and beating wolves -:)

City have tons of money to ride this out until the next set of rules and the next set after that are thrown out.

It’s more evidence towards the leagues motives, holding off a regulator.

This is all about money and power. Football is the sideshow. Lawyers and accountants take the stage…

Anyway, if we do get relegated at least we can climb the ladder again on equal footing hahahahaha.

Next rule please Sir.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Unread Posts

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top