No different to all the negative sh**e that's been published for however many years.It’s amazing how one piece of info comes out about a few possible letters to journalists and all of a sudden all this other ‘bullshit’ comes out
My mate said…
I heard…
People then start going with it like it’s gospel
It’s all a load of shite much as I wish it was true
Probably, but do you think there has been a definite change in mood music this last month or so?
A little disappointed TwoBirds aren't on our side. Can't think why.Guessing: I think it is fair to assume the PL took advice from Bird and Bird and the KC on the merits. The precise drafting of the announcement then prepared by the legal dept at the PL and "checked" but missed by the external counsel. Then the case effectively handed over to Bird and Bird and counsel to run vs City. Bird and Bird then referring back for instructions and involvement of PL legal department. If at any point, Counsel thinks the game has changed (say new revelation or evidence) then of course, Counsel speak up. Counsel don't like losing so speak up. The client doesn't always listen or chooses to accept risk say for optics.
A Scouser playing the victim is such a rarity nowadays.What is this gibbering oaf talking about; "there's so much we can't write because of the laws of libel". If something constitutes "libel", then by definition it's a false statement and, whilst that's the stock in trade of the likes of Evans, of course any "melonhead" who believes in the principle of journalistic integrity will want it stopped.
If he "knows" anything detrimental to our club, then he should publish regardless. If it's true, he has nothing to fear. The only truth here I'm afraid, is he's another scouse shithouse.
Exactly why i thought long n hard before posting …It’s amazing how one piece of info comes out about a few possible letters to journalists and all of a sudden all this other ‘bullshit’ comes out
My mate said…
I heard…
People then start going with it like it’s gospel
It’s all a load of shite much as I wish it was true
But how much of that has simply spriralled from the first pieces of information (which I think came from Tolmie?). That information was just that the club are very confident, something which they've maintained from the start of all this and in any case unlikely to come out and say "yeah we might be fucked here".
It seems to me loads have jumped on the back of the initial post and are hedging their bets in pretending to know something and consequently it's getting even more people excited.
Consider me skeptical.
The hearing date won't be announced, will it?
Exactly why i thought long n hard before posting …
Well you’d hope the brief fee was enough to keep them from sweeping the streets, without the need for any refreshers…Agreed but its a common misconception they just want to take the money, say, for the full trial.
Well you’d hope the brief fee was enough to keep them from sweeping the streets, without the need for any refreshers…
It goes on, of course it does, but it’s the the exception that proves the rule imo. Outrageous that some cunts take the money and don’t do the best for the punter. Absolute fucking lowlife.
Proper chancerTbf this kid just jumps on the back of proper ITK snippets.
Yep. Absolutely staggering the amount of people who believe this shiteIt’s amazing how one piece of info comes out about a few possible letters to journalists and all of a sudden all this other ‘bullshit’ comes out
My mate said…
I heard…
People then start going with it like it’s gospel
It’s all a load of shite much as I wish it was true
Possibly, but my spider senses have noticed a slight change in narrative in (some of) the press, then Masters coming out with "the case will resolve itself", then the TH tweets about City LBAs followed by a marked shift in tone from some "journalists" and then finally some more optimistic news on possible outcomes.
Right to be sceptical, of course, but there just seems to have been a change. What it means is any fucker's guess :)
Yeah that’s my take…. Anyone checked
- Fat **** Anfield agenda
- Mckola & his OJ
- Neville & Carragher blatant lies
- The Harris twins
Etc
He’s a complete fraud. I remember the summer where he gained a following through rehashing tolmie’s posts from here. Then that following has got him onto YouTube channels/podcasts etc. He’s a complete know-nothing fraud.This guy isn’t ITK. Just posts other people’s stuff, like team news etc.
As has been said, there have been PLENTY of court cases over time, day in day out , all day every day, worldwide where the defence or prosecution have less than 0% chance of winning but a lawyer will happily take the case on because they are paid handsomely for it.
Lawyers are the biggest gangsters going
A public Parliamentary Enquiry should be held into why the breaches/charges were brought.I’ve watched a fair bit of the postmasters inquiry & it’s been amazing to see the level of incompetence from well paid professionals. (legal & executive)
Like the old ladies knitting as they watch a murder trial I’ve become a fan of the KCs grilling them about their motives. Would City be entitled to see Premier league paperwork, phone records, emails etc
We know it’s been political, & it’s cost the game tens of millions that could have gone to EFL or grassroots. Heads need to roll.