Probably not since the Der Spiegel allegations, but we’re apparently demanding messages dating back to 2009.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
PL charge City for alleged breaches of financial rules
- Thread starter ayrshire_blue
- Start date
Probably not since the Der Spiegel allegations, but we’re apparently demanding messages dating back to 2009.
Ah that's before der spiegel so maybe there is something discriminating
I’m sure @projectriver will be along at some point to say that this is just standard procedure in such cases, and nothing particularly noteworthy!
journolud
Well-Known Member
Is it us demanding them or the tribunal based on evidence they have that think they should be produced? Evidence we have no doubt given themProbably not since the Der Spiegel allegations, but we’re apparently demanding messages dating back to 2009.
I’m sure @projectriver will be along at some point to say that this is just standard procedure in such cases, and nothing particularly noteworthy!
Haha yeah he likes to keep our feet firmly on the ground and not get to excited!
Seems a strange one this (possibly in a good way).Probably not since the Der Spiegel allegations, but we’re apparently demanding messages dating back to 2009.
I don’t see how conversations between Masters/Scudamore and directors or other clubs etc has any bearing on whether City have submitted false accounts.
They’re either false or they aren’t, regardless of whether there is a cartel working against the club.
TueartsCossackSpray
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 2 Sep 2008
- Messages
- 595
The Fame drama teacher who was the sacrificial lamb when there were budget issues within the academy ?
Sorry, yes - that was phrased badly.Is it us demanding them or the tribunal based on evidence they have that think they should be produced? Evidence we have no doubt given them
Alan Harper's Tash
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 12 Dec 2010
- Messages
- 60,019
Seems to fit the discrimination case better than the 115 one.Seems a strange one this (possibly in a good way).
I don’t see how conversations between Masters/Scudamore and directors or other clubs etc has any bearing on whether City have submitted false accounts.
They’re either false or they aren’t, regardless of whether there is a cartel working against the club.