I don’t think that is correct. I’ve heard this from a few sources one of them being Stefan. They can bring private cases against City plus Everton and Forest if they want. In fact I think Stefan said it was almost certain they would try.
It’s going on behind closed doors because that is what all the clubs signed up to.
It will be a covert affair. Suddenly you'll realise that you haven't see any stories from certain reporters for years. Then there will be faces that you never see on Sky, ESPN etc, etc. People will retire due to ill health, or new opportunities.
Oh joy !
It's the only hope they have of any success.
Or death, hopefully
I don't think there's much life left in the splitters club!!
Ignore him - the more people who react and respond the more he appears on peoples twitter and he gets more views etc. If we ignore him - his stats will reduce - his post may have views but his interactions (likes, reposts etc) is poor for someone whos trying to engage the world.
can you correct the ones that are wrong for me as I want to look at each definition. It's the only full list I could find
If we’re exonerated twice, they can get to fuck. We’ll have done fuck all wrong and they’ve tarnished our reputation because of an illegal hack and the red clubs throwing their weight around.
What I'd like to know is who's making the rules up so as everybody can agree to them.
Yeah not sure myself as the bit Ziedler was told, was that under the membership rules, no club could take action against a fellow member, so any member would seek compensation from the damages the PL procures. not saying that is right, but it makes sense to stop in house fighting, of course if City got relegated they would not be a member?
There will have to be a change of personnel at the top of the Prem though, how could we work with the persons who are currently running it going forward knowing how they feel about us as a club ?
