PL charge City for alleged breaches of financial rules

WTF did I miss? What's all this narrative about us being relegated? We're winning this case hands down. The louder and more frequent the twats chat shit the more obvious it becomes. They are going to get in every last dig possible before the jig is up. I'm going to say it, fuck it. Anyone claiming to be a Blue spouting all this negative shit is a fucking pussy, simple as. Take that defeatist shit and shove it up your ass. I'm believing in and supporting my club all the way no matter what these disgusting pieces of shit in the media say...
Roll on when we win this case, social media will go into total meltdown & it's going to be one hell of a piss boiling day haha
Opposing supporters brains will be fried & they'll have naff all to chuck at us, what a day that's going to be :-)
 
What amazes me is that nobody ever puts it to carragher, scholes etc that they themselves despite having clearly limited intelligence have managed to become multi millionaires simply by having the talent to kick a ball and take advantage of the opportunities presented to them, why do they find it so impossible that people with vastly superior intelligence and connections that give far greater opportunities would be able to earn much much larger fortunes?
 
In the nightmare scenario you describe surely our owners would just 'loan' the club a few hundred million like abramnovich did at Chelsea?
Not going to into great depth but the monies RA lent Chelsea wasn’t in one year but it was over multiple years to support losses that again had occurred over those years.A sizeable chunk going back to 2004

Had those losses happened over a 3 year cycle there would be absolutely no doubt that FFP charges would have been laid and almost certainly proven.

RA packaged all monies he had “ invested” in Chelsea into a debt not at Football Club level but into the holding company and that included his initial investment to purchase the shares from Bates and pay of the outstanding Euro Bond.

I am speaking from memory now so apologies if my memory is confused but didn’t Cities owners in effect write of substantial sums by Turing debt into equity ?
 
Not going to into great depth but the monies RA lent Chelsea wasn’t in one year but it was over multiple years to support losses that again had occurred over those years.A sizeable chunk going back to 2004

Had those losses happened over a 3 year cycle there would be absolutely no doubt that FFP charges would have been laid and almost certainly proven.

RA packaged all monies he had “ invested” in Chelsea into a debt not at Football Club level but into the holding company and that included his initial investment to purchase the shares from Bates and pay of the outstanding Euro Bond.

I am speaking from memory now so apologies if my memory is confused but didn’t Cities owners in effect write of substantial sums by Turing debt into equity ?
I think they probably had to as part of the takeover. As your a Chelsea fan I'm sure you know much more about RAs strategy than me also
 
Carragher, Simon Jordan, etc are allowed to sprout lies about the club because there's no one in the media on our side that pushes back. It's left to City fans to try to push back.

The only high profile former City player and supposed fan is Micah Richards and he's Sky's court jester.

Also the case that City don't litigate against this stuff. I hope that changes if the decision from the hearings is on our side.
Mica Richards can't tie his own shoe laces.

We probably need 3/4 experienced, professional and knowlegeable, broadcasters to represent the club.

We don't need cheerleaders, we need objective, pragmatic and authorative football/sports broadcast 'journalists' .

There's much to do to stop the tide ...and more to do to turn it !!
 
Mica Richards can't tie his own shoe laces.

We probably need 3/4 experienced, professional and knowlegeable, broadcasters to represent the club.

We don't need cheerleaders, we need objective, pragmatic and authorative football/sports broadcast 'journalists' .

There's much to do to stop the tide ...and more to do to turn it !!
Ask yourself this mate , have you ever tried talking to a rag, dipper etc and put your point of view across using facts, figures, rational thinking and logic? Has it made the slightest difference?

Now multiply that by a thousand where the media is concerned, facts and opinion do not matter to these people, they will believe what they want to believe to suit their agenda and any pushback would be wasted energy, if you want this in microchasm look at sunday arsenal fans were outraged by how much time was added on even tho it was factually clear and proven that they wasted way more time than was actually added on but the facts dont suit their agenda and what they need to believe so they remain outraged.
 
Mica Richards can't tie his own shoe laces.

We probably need 3/4 experienced, professional and knowlegeable, broadcasters to represent the club.

We don't need cheerleaders, we need objective, pragmatic and authorative football/sports broadcast 'journalists' .

There's much to do to stop the tide ...and more to do to turn it !!
But they don't want people like that on the TV, unfortunately.

Nedum would be a certainty, but he's too bright for them, and would most likely just get frustrated with having to sit in the same conversations as Sturridge, Micah and the rest of the banter crew.

Case in point against Arsenal; Merson, Walcott, Micah and Keane in the Sky studio, for arguably the biggest game of the season so far.

They know Micah doesn't represent City, so they've effectively got 2 Arsenal, a nodding dog, and Keane who just hates everyone.

Considering we've won, 4 titles in a row, and 6 of the last 7; you'd like to think they'd want some City representation to talk through how good we are, and what a joy it is to watch us every week.

You tell me why that isn't the case!
 
But they don't want people like that on the TV, unfortunately.

Nedum would be a certainty, but he's too bright for them, and would most likely just get frustrated with having to sit in the same conversations as Sturridge, Micah and the rest of the banter crew.

Case in point against Arsenal; Merson, Walcott, Micah and Keane in the Sky studio, for arguably the biggest game of the season so far.

They know Micah doesn't represent City, so they've effectively got 2 Arsenal, a nodding dog, and Keane who just hates everyone.

Considering we've won, 4 titles in a row, and 6 of the last 7; you'd like to think they'd want some City representation to talk through how good we are, and what a joy it is to watch us every week.

You tell me why that isn't the case!
You and I know the reason.
 
Ask yourself this mate , have you ever tried talking to a rag, dipper etc and put your point of view across using facts, figures, rational thinking and logic? Has it made the slightest difference?

Now multiply that by a thousand where the media is concerned, facts and opinion do not matter to these people, they will believe what they want to believe to suit their agenda and any pushback would be wasted energy, if you want this in microchasm look at sunday arsenal fans were outraged by how much time was added on even tho it was factually clear and proven that they wasted way more time than was actually added on but the facts dont suit their agenda and what they need to believe so they remain outraged.
It only starts to make a difference if I ask them about Munich families or pre match Hillsborough.

Most of them know little about current events and nothing about historic ones !!
 
The thing that makes me laugh about all this is all the know nowts from other clubs shouting, "It's not fair, City will just bribe and buy their way out of this!"
Think about it. There are very wealthy clubs who are being seriously harmed by our success. Liverpool, Arsenal, Chelsea and United. If you want you could throw in Spurs too and maybe the new upstarts Villa and Newcastle. So we have all these fuckers against us and we've seen how much influence they wield in the media as they have already won the propaganda war. That's how it's unfair from OUR perspective and shows just what we're up against.
And just who are they accusing of taking the bribe?
 
My boss is another one of these "it's impossible City turn over more revenue than United etc" folk, shockingly a United fan too
 
Roll on when we win this case, social media will go into total meltdown & it's going to be one hell of a piss boiling day haha
Opposing supporters brains will be fried & they'll have naff all to chuck at us, what a day that's going to be :-)
It will be the best day since the takeover day
 
It only starts to make a difference if I ask them about Munich families or pre match Hillsborough.

Most of them know little about current events and nothing about historic ones !!
Just Imagine what a four year deep dive into the financial dodgy dealings during Fergusons era would dredge up. Strip the titles
 
Mica Richards can't tie his own shoe laces.

We probably need 3/4 experienced, professional and knowlegeable, broadcasters to represent the club.

We don't need cheerleaders, we need objective, pragmatic and authorative football/sports broadcast 'journalists' .

There's much to do to stop the tide ...and more to do to turn it !!
Nedum, Michael Brown or Shay Given would all fight our corner better than Mr Laughing Gas
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top