So the magic hat video, have I listened correctly that he is stating that we did not provide UEFA with the evidence for our defence but UEFA were confident to just run with the stolen emails?
Here is me thinking all along that the 'no evidence' from CAS report was that UEFA had nothing to support the email claims.
I always thought that the accuser had to prove the allegations. How wrong was I.
So magic hat is suggesting that anyone can point the finger at anyone and do little more than that!
Here is me thinking all along that the 'no evidence' from CAS report was that UEFA had nothing to support the email claims.
I always thought that the accuser had to prove the allegations. How wrong was I.
So magic hat is suggesting that anyone can point the finger at anyone and do little more than that!
Last edited by a moderator: