PL charge City for alleged breaches of financial rules

halfcenturyup said:
For anyone interested:

View attachment 138144

The only thing dragging on is Ziegler flogging this dead horse ......

At least we "know" now the compensation claims in respect of Everyone's first punishment were withdrawn, with the exception of Burnley whose claim is still in process.
Click to expand...
the fact that tottenham are in on it shows you how laughable it is, tottenham claiming compensation is like your mate dave claiming compensation from max verstappen for stopping him winning a grand prix.
 
Last edited:
halfcenturyup said:
Interesting that. Thanks for posting.

Would you update it following Ziegler's piece this week? Only four clubs seeking compensation, or do you still think it may be more?
Click to expand...
I see no reason why it would only be those four. Suspect those 4 have so far had one barrister which is where the story is from but that wouldn't necessarily mean that was the limit. Until we know what the judgment says, no club would rule out legal action and so therefore would need to rule it in because, as I have always said, English law statute of limitations applies to the PL rules.
 
slbsn said:
I see no reason why it would only be those four. Suspect those 4 have so far had one barrister which is where the story is from but that wouldn't necessarily mean that was the limit. Until we know what the judgment says, no club would rule out legal action and so therefore would need to rule it in because, as I have always said, English law statute of limitations applies to the PL rules.
Click to expand...
I think if they go down the legal action route, with claim and counterclaim they are going to get what they always wanted which is the destruction of pl and the esl.
 
slbsn said:
I see no reason why it would only be those four. Suspect those 4 have so far had one barrister which is where the story is from but that wouldn't necessarily mean that was the limit. Until we know what the judgment says, no club would rule out legal action and so therefore would need to rule it in because, as I have always said, English law statute of limitations applies to the PL rules.
Click to expand...
They can only sue if we are guilty of fraud, and if we are guilty of fraud, limitation is suspended. So why the need to reserve the right to claim damages?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Unread Posts

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
✖
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.