115 not out and forced the follow on?
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
PL charge City for alleged breaches of financial rules
- Thread starter ayrshire_blue
- Start date
Pingu the Penguin
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 29 Sep 2009
- Messages
- 7,826
Nah just some dirty forrin type. All the same. Corrupt. Etc ((c) Liverpool echo)This is The ultimate evidence that we have nothing to hide and is innocent. If we were guilty on some of The more servere charges there is no way he would testify. A cross examination of The owner, would be out of The question if we had any concern about The outcome.
calumdown
Well-Known Member
not sure they have a direct translation for fuckCan just hear him now
What the f××k are you lot on about .
ما الذي تتحدث عنه بحق الجحيم؟
Keith Moon
Well-Known Member
Not a chance that he rocked up in court. Below his pay grade.At CAS he testified by sworn letter that he had never paid for a sponsorship or ordered anyone to do so. My bet is this was his testimony again. Maybe in person.
But if the tribunal would not accept written evidence….or the PL insisted on a right to question him.Not a chance that he rocked up in court. Below his pay grade.
Prestwich_Blue
Well-Known Member
Video evidence?But if the tribunal would not accept written evidence….or the PL insisted on a right to question him.
Maybe. It was just a post saying Mansour had gone into bat. No evidence, though.Video evidence?
Bald fraud
Well-Known Member
With mr Kipling fighting our corner I feel even more confident tonight!It sounds exceedingly good if the big man is brought in.
I'd love to know how they approach him or ask the awkward questions.
Cobwebcat
Well-Known Member
Tueartsoverhead kick
Well-Known Member
Oh who would that be