PL charge City for alleged breaches of financial rules

IMHO I think Ziegler is right - it will be alot sooner than that (end of Jan - maybe) as the 3 man panel will have worked out already it's a load of bollox and just a load of hacked emails spodged together to desperately try and make it look like something else. UEFA round 1 reincarnated. Round 2 and beyond same result. Witch hunting wankers
The quicker the better for us. If we have irrefutable proof it should not take that long, at least on the substantive charges.
 
IMHO I think Ziegler is right - it will be alot sooner than that (end of Jan - maybe) as the 3 man panel will have worked out already it's a load of bollox and just a load of hacked emails spodged together to desperately try and make it look like something else. UEFA round 1 reincarnated. Round 2 and beyond same result. Witch hunting wankers
Not going to say I necessarily agree 100% but regarding Ziegler, as much as he's a slap-headed shit-stirring **** he often gets the inside track. People call him a KFA on here but it was he who broke the story about Liverpool hacking our scouting database. Now if he's saying end of January that's miles sooner than many have predicted, even those legal eagles on here, and I do wonder if he's had a steer from somewhere. It could even be City who have told him that ;)
 
The quicker the better for us. If we have irrefutable proof it should not take that long, at least on the substantive charges.
What if the PL have irrefutable proof? Would it not be a quick resolution in that instance too? ;)

Edit: I'm not saying they have of course but a quick resolution might not necessarily mean it's good news
 
What if the PL have irrefutable proof? Would it not be a quick resolution in that instance too? ;)

Edit: I'm not saying they have of course but a quick resolution might not necessarily mean it's good news
If the PL had irrefutable proof it would have been leaked to every media outlet going. Leak like sieve when it’s in their favour.
 
What if the PL have irrefutable proof? Would it not be a quick resolution in that instance too? ;)

Edit: I'm not saying they have of course but a quick resolution might not necessarily mean it's good news
Either way it's win or bust for both parties. If PL wins then we are truly fucked, similarly if City wins then PL top management is fucked.

The stakes are very high here.
 
What if the PL have irrefutable proof? Would it not be a quick resolution in that instance too? ;)

Edit: I'm not saying they have of course but a quick resolution might not necessarily mean it's good news
If the PL had proof it would have been done and dusted five years ago. And it would have been leaked out in advance. United would not have touched Berrada.
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.