PL charge City for alleged breaches of financial rules

hcblue95 said:
I wonder why Chelsea haven't been charged yet. Surely their case is a slam dunk if they've admitted to it?
Click to expand...
You would have thought wouldn’t you .

What we seem to have admitted to is submission of information that potentially may not be complete what that actually means we can only guess. It may be the subsequent leaks give a clue but without any issues with the PL reviewing Chelsea books or indeed there being any apparent obstacles there is no way that an investigation should take as long as it has taken

When masters was interviewed some months ago he said two things

1) The matter was nearing conclusion and
2) Extremely complex as it involved a previous owner.

I pointed out a while ago that one of the potential options to the PL was to agree a settlement for a variety of reasons one being that without access to RAs records or indeed him it becomes incredibly difficult I wonder if that’s what’s going to happen with a large settlement being diverted from the £100+ million being withheld from the sale pending settlement of these type of matters
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Unread Posts

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
✖
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.