Disclosure is normal but only documents relevant to the case are disclosed.
Let’s say there’s an email from Daniel Levy to Masters saying “go and get the bastards in any way you can, I don’t care whether it’s justified or not”.
In the 115 case, so what?
It doesn’t have any bearing on whether City’s accounts are false. Granted it would make clear to the tribunal there was a concerted vendetta against the club, but if the accounts are fraudulent then we’re still fucked.
Regardless of there being a vendetta, submitting accurate accounts is the sole responsibility of City.
Something doesn’t seem right about this.