Arsenal, Liverpool, Newcastle, Villa, Brighton, Bournemouth.
They might not have had consistency in terms of getting results over the course of the season but they were all capable of playing more fluid, incisive, energetic football than our pedestrian relentless passing game which achieved results by just wearing teams down.
In our defence virtually every team we faced simply parked the bus, which could be used as an excuse for our style of play, but it doesn't change the fact that there were teams playing more incisive football than us throughout the season.
And, I think, that in the last decade those teams between them have one Premier League win and one CL win.
We have played some of the most intelligent football in PL history. It has featured moments of utter brilliance, of course, and has set the benchmark for the way that football has developed.
If you are judging purely on this season then you also have to acknowledge that for large parts of the season Rodri, Walker, Bobb, KDB, Foden, Grealish, Kovacic, Stones, Ake, Akanji, and Doku have been injured or ill. The same is now true of Dias. To judge Pep's tenure on this season would be flawed, IMO. We have won six of the last seven Premier League titles, the CL, treble winners, and have set a host of PL records.
Teams have developed the low block, fast counter, as a model of the way to beat us, but they have largely failed, until now. Why is that? Because we dominated the ball and achieved unheard of levels of possession which denied the opportunity for a counter. Now, without the fitness levels in our team, rivals are achieving temporary success and the media are all over it because they love to bring down a winner, especially a foreign winner, and rival fans are desperate for our success to end. They are emboldened so feel they have license to dismiss Pep as an also-ran, and the team as a cheque-book success. This is the tribalism of football and the culture of the British press. It is not objective truth.