Stoned Rose
Well-Known Member
Exactly.Always thought that if there really was evidence pointing to financial fraud then it wouldn't be a three man panel connected to the Premier League who look at the evidence.
It would be the serious fraud office, the national crime agency, the police, etc.
Let’s say this was a teacher accused of abusing a pupil the police wouldn’t say “let your professional regulator investigate this for 4 years before we think about arresting you”.
The 2 investigations would just run simultaneously.
If the teacher was charged or convicted that would essentially seal the deal for the regulator.