PL charge City for alleged breaches of financial rules

That's the point. He states there is an intention to work with no rules to continue to enable fraudulent commercial deals.

I spoke to City the other week when Sherwood said on Sky that we don't play by the rules and they had to issue an on-air apology.
If there were no rules there would be no need for fraudulent commercial deals, would there? We would just get whatever sponsorships we wanted. What the fuck is he on about?
 
Has it never crossed the minds of the owners of these hard-done-by, struggling to compete, type of clubs like dippers and rags, that if the rules were relaxed that they could do exactly what City have done, and gone out and marketed themselves for investment from all corners of the globe.
I wonder if the American owners would like to put the financial well-being of their clubs before their own selfish money leeching ambition?
 
It's incredible how much our freedom of speech has been eroded. Personally I would not shout about Heysel at a football match but people are supposed to have a right to protest in this country.
It has become taboo to mention the behaviour of the Dippers at Heysel and Hillsborough. History has even been rewritten about the latter. I utterly despise Liverpool FC, their players and most of all their supporters.
 


It's shocking the way the press/media and the police ignore their behaviour. Even in our own statium we couldn't arrest the bastard that throw that beer pot with coins in. Two events against our club and not one arrest.
Utter scum based fans, club and muckyside plod
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top