gordondaviesmoustache
Well-Known Member
They'd better not have watercress from the Meon Valley on them
They'd better not have watercress from the Meon Valley on them
I think it is arbitration
Rule X in the Premier League Handbook 22/23 states that it will be done in accordance with the Abitration Act 1996
Almost a given due to our refusal to provide commercially sensitive information the like of which was previously leaked to our rivals.Thought fines for non-cooperation was a certainty anyway?
Quite apart from the fact that they have enough to be getting on with for the time being in any event, just how many combinations of the possible verdicts on those 130 charges do you think the panel wanted to be addressed on in the event that the League proved some of its charges but not all?
Thought that was it 5 minutes ago at 10am. The big yellow Sky Sports Breaking News Banner, bang on the hour…….
Womens Cricket captain resigns FFS!!!!!
Some wrong'uns on here.
Tea is a drink that can be taken anytime of day.
I certainly oh am not getting carried away - there’s too much at stake to be certain about anything at the moment - but for me this is another soft signal and the sort of headline we haven’t seen until this last week or two.
View attachment 150644
I certainly oh am not getting carried away - there’s too much at stake to be certain about anything at the moment - but for me this is another soft signal and the sort of headline we haven’t seen until this last week or two.
View attachment 150644
He said that he is obviously not worried about the case given the signing of his new 9.5 year contract.The hint is ?
If you're paying, then why not.Bacon bagels?
It was their goal at 0-3 that gave them hope and made Fergie go more attacking. If it wasn’t for that goal the 1-6 doesn’t happen.i think we'll all be a little disappointed if we're not completely exonerated.
yet simultaneously delighted if we're only guilty on the non-cooperation parts.
as an example, i was a little disappointed with united scoring in the 6-1 thrashing, yet simultaneously delighted.
The hint is ?
I just found it comforting that the papers have decided to rehash the old news of Erling’s contract today and do so with a positive spin re: the charges.The hint is ?
First sentence is incredible.I defintely know that some people know already, I just can't say who they are as I don't know.
All I DO know is, we're going to find out VERY soon, or sometime later, could be one of the two. The news is going to be VERY favourable to one group and DEVASTATING to another group, as to which I cannot say right now, for obvious reasons.
So keep the faith Blues, or lose it, it depends which.
Tbf, it's a new quote from Erling, so not technically rehashing old news.I just found it comforting that the papers have decided to rehash the old news of Erling’s contract today and do so with a positive spin re: the charges.
Doesn’t mean anything concrete of course, but we never ever got anything even remotely entertaining the possibility of exoneration until about a week or two ago.
And I believe, but do not know, that Mullock is seen as a City-friendly journalist so I’m putting two and two together and getting minus 115/130