Jim Tolmie's Underpants
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 27 Jun 2007
- Messages
- 4,602
Haven’t been on this thread much for a few months, have a look today and this is the first post that I read near enough. Fucking ace.He's replied.
View attachment 171557
me too.I feel a mixture of sadness and happiness seeing / watching that.
It might come as a surprise to you, but not most fellow Blue Mooners, but I can`t find one like left for you on any of todays discussions you`ve had on this thread. Now that speaks volumes as to how much you really know about this subject and how little you know about other events as you`ve been totally shown up with your so called "knowledge" on other topics.It might come as a surprise to you that this is not the only source on discussion/information on this topic. It has also substantially moved on in the last 2 years. Your post adds nothing to the discussion other than to demonstrate your limited powers of expression and an ability to engage in personal insults.
mungo is the patron saint of glasgow.
the best contemporary reggae producers in the uk are from glasgow,
they are called mungo's hi-fi
why, exactly?Sorry to be the bearer of bad news mate but that’s not reggae.
Corrected for accuracy*Clubs in red in the red are doubly exempt*
Because it sounds absolutely fuck all like it.why, exactly?
in your opinion.Because it sounds absolutely fuck all like it.
subdotmission.com
perhaps this is more like the sort of traditional thing you are thinking of,Because it sounds absolutely fuck all like it.
i'll say one thing for you,Given your late joining of the discussion I can only assume given your concern for my sleeping habits that you have just got out of bed. That might explain the typing errors in your post.
The differences between slbsn and I stem from the fact that he/she utilises the letter of the law in his/her responses and therefore I might assume he/she has a legal background. I do not but firmly believe that the law can be bent to suit the occasion. I'm not sure anybody concerned with the law would admit that in a public forum.
Within their argument they continually point out that this or that is not relevant to the City case and dismiss whether pressure might be brought by a Govt on such a matter. I pointed out The Chinese Spy case which again was dismissed. Others in the legal profession also question the decision.
My view is that the case has sensitivities which are also reflected in the 115 charges. Either I am silly which I can live or slbsnis is somewhat pedantic.
My sauces are saying this month…….
If you have seen him on talksport you would know slbsn is not a he/she!Given your late joining of the discussion I can only assume given your concern for my sleeping habits that you have just got out of bed. That might explain the typing errors in your post.
The differences between slbsn and I stem from the fact that he/she utilises the letter of the law in his/her responses and therefore I might assume he/she has a legal background. I do not but firmly believe that the law can be bent to suit the occasion. I'm not sure anybody concerned with the law would admit that in a public forum.
Within their argument they continually point out that this or that is not relevant to the City case and dismiss whether pressure might be brought by a Govt on such a matter. I pointed out The Chinese Spy case which again was dismissed. Others in the legal profession also question the decision.
My view is that the case has sensitivities which are also reflected in the 115 charges. Either I am silly which I can live or slbsnis is somewhat pedantic.
perhaps this is more like the sort of traditional thing you are thinking of,
or is eek-a-mouse not reggae to you either?
tell me yellowman isn't reggae
I did suspect he might not know it was Stefan Borson he was sparring with.If you have seen him on talksport you would know slbsn is not a he/she!