Re: Yaya?
Because it's absolutely harmless and it reassures fans that believed he will miss the Sunderland game due to injury that he's ready to go for said game.
It's only mardarses reading into it something that it isn't.
Btw he's not contradicting Pellegrini, Pellegrini said he rested him because he felt a strain in his groin before the Baggies game, Yaya has reaffirmed that he was rested.
Zubrman said:jimharri said:Agreed. Why did he/his agent feel the need to post that tweet, knowing full well the trouble that may cause. Basically, he's contradicting what the manager said. Even if what he tweeted is true, he should have kept quiet.Feed the Elk said:Not sure why he would have tweeted that publicly.
Reading between the lines he's not happy at not playing, which is fine, but this should have stayed in the dressing room.
I can't imagine that pellers will be particularly chuffed at this latest declaration which has been written presumably by his agent. I reckon he's off as soon as we find a replacement, which may well be frank meaning bye bye in January. IMO
Furthermore, why did the club feel the need to retweet it?
Because it's absolutely harmless and it reassures fans that believed he will miss the Sunderland game due to injury that he's ready to go for said game.
It's only mardarses reading into it something that it isn't.
Btw he's not contradicting Pellegrini, Pellegrini said he rested him because he felt a strain in his groin before the Baggies game, Yaya has reaffirmed that he was rested.