sir baconface
Well-Known Member
Panto season already.
Liverpool are behind you.
Hahaha. Brilliant. I feel I should say “Oh no, they’re not”....
... except they fcukin well are! :-D
Panto season already.
Liverpool are behind you.
No it's not. It's about them getting attacked by masked Kiev locals.
My point is that it's open to that interpretation and it's celebrating violence.
I don't want anyone to get me wrong here: this is a storm in a teacup and the level of media coverage was not proportionate. I think it's ridiculous.
At the same time I can still think it's a bad look for city fans.
In memory of the 35th anniversary of the Heysrl tragedy puma will be creating a black & white city kit for our last season in the champs league before a ban.
See how the fckers like that!
Including the dippers, who didn't complain about it in January when they lost on their visit, strange we didn't hear a dickie bird then, when they were still top.There is no ambiguity to the song lyrics at all. All of the lyrics relate to the CL final hence the reference to Kiev and Ramos injuring Salah. But then everyone who’s been to the Etihad the past season already knows this.
Including the dippers, who didn't complain about it in January when they lost on their visit, strange we didn't hear a dickie bird then, when they were still top.
The only reason its come up now is because they are shit losers, and want any excuse to taint what City did.
As I said earlier, don't think I've sung it before, as I didn't much like it being nicked from another team, but I will on Saturday now.
Is that a five year ban
Haha.I think the song is in very bad taste and attempts to say “well it’s just about a local brawl in Kiev” are at best pedantic and at worst totally missing the point.
City’s response has equally been less than impressive.
I'll happily join in with that too.As a suggestion. Why don’t we go back to the song we used to have about searching in the gutter for something to eat and finding a dead cat and thinking it’s a treat.