Political relations between UK-EU

I can imagine what you’d have said if we acted in the same way, your postings tonight have been in defence of them and you know it.

Hmmm, just to recap. We put in the AZ contract that we wanted the UK produced supply to come to us first, and the EU have now issued a transparency order to ensure the EU produced supply *checks notes* comes to them first?

You see my dilemma...if I criticise both actions I will be accused of dissing the UK and if I support both actions I will accused of defending the EU.

Of course I could support the UK decision and criticise the EU decision, but that would be a tad hypocritical don’t you think?
 
The Guardian are not even attempting to support the EU position, which is incredible as they have to pander to an almost 100% Remain readership.

The EU have completely lost the plot here.
Anyone attempting to defend the EU over this just look ridiculous.
Those that do choose to say silent...
 
Hmmm, just to recap. We put in the AZ contract that we wanted the UK produced supply to come to us first, and the EU have now issued a transparency order to ensure the EU produced supply *checks notes* comes to them first?

You see my dilemma...if I criticise both actions I will be accused of dissing the UK and if I support both actions I will accused of defending the EU.

Of course I could support the UK decision and criticise the EU decision, but that would be a tad hypocritical don’t you think?

They two are not remotely comparable at all and you know it
 
It's the perfect 'opportunity' (for want of a better word) for them to rightfully criticise the EU's actions and show to other's that they aren't just EU fanboys.

As you say, it is very telling and kudos to the ones who have done because we're all together in the criticism of this action. I'd say it's laughable but this situation isn't funny at all and do hope that common sense prevails, the EU holds its hands up and rescinds the invocation of A16.

Es69vIPXUAIMxqd
 
Hmmm, just to recap. We put in the AZ contract that we wanted the UK produced supply to come to us first, and the EU have now issued a transparency order to ensure the EU produced supply *checks notes* comes to them first?

You see my dilemma...if I criticise both actions I will be accused of dissing the UK and if I support both actions I will accused of defending the EU.

Of course I could support the UK decision and criticise the EU decision, but that would be a tad hypocritical don’t you think?
You’re missing the point we signed, paid and approved it 3 months earlier.
 
It's a matter of supply chain and distribution to key strategic locations. All EU designated vaccine is being manufactured in the EU. AZ owns the knowledge, they transfer that knowledge to the capable manufacturing sites and support them technically to implement that knowledge. This is called technology transfer.

This issue has resulted because AZ briefed the EU they would only be able to supply them with ~60% less than they promised to deliver. That's entirely because an EU Contract Manufacturing Organisation has produced a batch with a 60% deficient yield. It's only on the CMO.

If you add a kilo of ingredients to the pan to make a kilo of food and you only get 200g would you ignore it? At this point AZ are technical support and distribution / production coordinators

Your second sentence is just simply not true and also contradicts the contract. There’s always been planned distribution to the EU from the U.K. sites and vice versatility, the company I work for does some of the logistics for it.

You’re right that’s the main reason for the shortfall. It’s the reason AZ gave for not providing some (more) from the U.K. site that’s caused the issue though.
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.