Political relations between UK-EU

As a Leaver I'm more than happy with our exit from the EU & I actually think UK/EU relations will be either no worse or perhaps better than when we were members. The UK, including many 'soft' Remainers, has never bought into the federal thrust of ever closer Union and really only wanted the economic part of the EU experience. There is a political and recent history perspective for many EU nations, particularly Germany & France, that just doesn't exist in the UK.

Now we are out the EU won't be harbouring any illusions about us rejoining and so pragmatism will be the order of the day. The UK is a major economy with which the EU enjoys a very large trade surplus and it is still a major player in guaranteeing European security. There will be competition of course but there is competition between EU member states currently.
 
Last edited:
Really nice to see some objectivity introduced on the thread

I hold very similar views to the ones you express - and the reason that I expressed my views that it would be good if the thread could be forwards looking is because I am hopeful that, as people adapt to the reality that change has happened - they can start to move on with their focus being on the potential for the future rather than being obsessed with the previous 'status quo'

I think that this will happen quite readily - as I mentioned in an earlier post.

Already there are discussions commencing about the role of the UK's Financial Services sector in the EU and some individual countries are making decisions to allow the City to continue using previous arrangements until new ones are agreed

And now that the focus is not on negotiations, but making profit/GDP, I would expect to see a number of IT/Technology enabled changes to processes that addresses/reduces/removes frictions that impacts trade.

For me - the most important test of the scope of the success that Brexit will bring will be the decisions this government brings forward with regards to investment in infrastructure and other programmes.

I am far from a supporter of the Conservatives, or indeed this PM - but I do think that they have an instinct for survival - and for them to survive 2024 they need to be able to point at 'hard differences' that they have made in 'levelling up' - and ideally how those improvements were only possible due to Brexit.

I think that some on here might be surprised about the policies, priorities and decisions that will come forwards in the next 12-18 months
GDP is bound to go up with £2billion being spent on customs officers. (The CETB people who gave you the dubious figure that UK GDP would be 23% higher than France by 2035 has also pointed out that the UK now includes drug-dealing and prostitution in our GDP.)
 
So if you claim to be resident in Spain and are returning there, you have to be able to prove it. First step back to Fascism & a military government under the new Franco presumably.
Why are they claiming to be resident, rather than just going on holiday? I presume it's because they want to stay longer than 90 days.
 
Since Theresa May said it, I have rather embraced the "citizen of nowhere" badge - that sort of labelling is part of what I hate, but it means my being British is now just an accident of birth, and if I could (like in NI) have chosen to be an EU citizen rather than British, then an EU citizen I would remain. I'm almost sorry I became so tied to City - without that, perhaps I might have looked to live abroad - and while holidays abroad are not exactly a good test, there have been many places where I have thought "I could happily live here".

I‘m the same. That phrase, her speech, did it for me, it weakened a natural emotional attachment to country. Theresa May more than anyone increased my antipathy to Brexit and, to be honest, some people who support it, the lies they tell are difficult to stomach.
 
So if you claim to be resident in Spain and are returning there, you have to be able to prove it. First step back to Fascism & a military government under the new Franco presumably.
I try and ignore utter nonsense put up about Spain, the holiday situation, the residency regulations etc; You can travel, (covid excepted) you can buy property, and you can apply for residency. The residency criteria, meant you
have to provide various checks and proofs, if these are OK,
so are you. They are, or indeed recently were, experiencing a property boom,
these are marketed all over Europe, where I go thousands are being sold, to
many nationalities, I know Americans who have just retired there.
 
Ahh, I am absolutely delighted to see you’ve gone down the racism and bigotry route so soon into our discussion. Didn’t think it would be long until someone pulled that card out.

Did you miss the part where the UK’s new immigration policy, which I support, no longer makes it easier for people coming from predominantly white Christian countries in Europe, than those coming from elsewhere, and instead is totally blind to creed and colour, as long as you’re qualified in areas we need?

I have given you figures and the figures of 100,000’s of net people adding to our population each year is, as I’ve repeated, unsustainable.


The Labour Party apologised for their policy under Blair, which was to radically change the country via migration and was done so as government policy. Straw and Blair banned the word immigration from cabinet meetings and made it possible for people to claim refugee status, that were not refugees.

It was a systematic and encouraged policy to change society and they never uttered a word to the British people on whether they wanted it.

You need to read the book “Broken Vows” by Tom Bower. It was a best seller and described as more comprehensive than the Chilcot Inquiry.

Straw has apologised following the release of the book.

Regarding the government, it won’t take you long to find posts on this forum of me hammering the Tories for something or calling them utterly incompetent.

I am not defending their record but I am saying that if and when, after Covid, they finally do spend on infrastructure and housing, it would be ridiculous to add to the pressure by allowing free movement.

Culture wise it’s simple. The exact same reason I felt deep sadness when I ended up in Benidorm on a stage do, seeing what we’ve done there, I wouldn’t want the same to happen here. One local there, in Benidorm, said to me that whilst locals are glad there’s money coming in through tourism, it’s sad how their town has effectively turned into “Blackpool in the sun”, he genuinely said that yes. This is my point on the economics not always equaling quality of life, he’d have preferred it to stay Spanish.

Immigrants should be integrated and welcomed and whilst they should retain many aspects of their own culture, allowing whole towns and areas to house them at a short, sharp rate, creates tension and fails to integrate them.

I will reiterate before I get more false accusations by those incapable of arguing in another way, I am pro immigration. Just not freedom of movement.

Let’s be honest the governments points based system might in theory be better and it might in theory be more balanced or less discriminatory than freedom of movement but it’s going to be rubbish the government is in generally incompetent and bigoted

Also governments are incapable of working out how many people will apply to live in a country what points they will get and how many jobs will need filling by people from outside also often the people with the least amount of points end up being the most hardworking or creative and entrepreneurial

You keep asserting that a certain amount of immigration is unsustainable and that freedom of movement resulted in more than that amount. Yet we clearly have lots of space as had been pointed out multiple times and deliberately ignored by you and others and we have lots of vacancies in positions that are hard to fill with native born people this will only be exacerbated by the pandemic as it pushes public sector workers out due to stress and ill health and we demand better public sector services because we finally recognize there importance Is it over 100k in vacancies in both the health and social care.

Give me specific examples of people who have not integrated or what would constitute not integrating odds based on previous debates the people won’t be European and many of the examples will be flawed or bigoted ( Nigel and his doesn’t like listening to foreign languages even tho he had a German wife and kids)

Your criticism of freedom of movement is based on how we implemented it I think had we implement the restrictions we where allowed you wouldn’t have complained it’s why I doubt despite the general bigotry coming out of the government that they will do much to reduce immigration especially when they are desperate to get trade deal which will include increased number of visas for China India Australia Canada New Zealand and America

Generally the tension comes from the people not liking the foreigners not there lack of integration or the numbers it’s also tends to be more about people From outside Europe and people in working class norther towns The places that dislike immigration the most are the places with the least amount of immigration

Immigration / freedom of movement was reducing before we left and was further reduced because we chose to leave fall in exchange worries of being unwelcome we didn’t actually need to leave

Why is the emphasis on freedom of movement always about people coming here what about us going to Europe and missing that
 
Why are they claiming to be resident, rather than just going on holiday? I presume it's because they want to stay longer than 90 days.
It's because they live there, like a few people I know including a couple of City fans. So they obviously have to be able to stay longer than 90 days in 180.

It's the same as places like the USA, where you can only go for 3 months at a time unless you've got a green card or an appropriate visa. My son went over on a student visa but managed to lose his passport with the visa in it early in his stay.

To get a replacement visa, he would have needed to come back to the UK and reapply to the US Embassy. This was a bit of a Catch-22 as, if they'd refused for some reason, he couldn't go back to finish his course. So he couldn't travel home for over 4 years, until he got his green card.
 
...Why is the emphasis on freedom of movement always about people coming here what about us going to Europe and missing that

Because they think they still have freedom of movement. Freedom of movement applies to others. They are unable to grasp that other European nationals still have freedom of movement. The only European nationals who no longer have Freedom of movement is the British.

It is British, or English exceptionalism at its finest, leading to an inability to comprehend that the only people they took freedom of movement away from is themselves.
 
The point I've been trying to make is that things change and people & institutions adapt over time. Change is never easy though. I went on a consultancy skills many years ago when working for an international consultancy and we worked in groups of 6 or 7. You worked with the same people during the day & in the evening from the start of the course on Sunday, and got a great group dynamic going. I can still picture & remember the names of people in my group, 20 years on, despite the fact we only knew each other for 6 days and never worked together again.

On Thursday morning the course tutors came in and said they were changing the groups and they moved a couple of people out of each group into another. There was uproar, with people actually in tears, and the whole group dynamic broke down. At one of the breaks, they reinstated the old groups and said it was a practical lesson about how change impacts people and that we had to think about these impacts. Even though we knew it was coming, the actual terms of our departure made it a precipitate event, with just days to spare.

Some things won't be as good for sure but other things may be better. No one knows yet though, so no one can say for sure that it's a pending complete disaster or the best thing since sliced bread. As I said, it's like El Alamein; the end of the beginning. Where the relationship goes from here will depend on the desire of the government and the goodwill of the EU. I even reckon the EU might secretly be glad to see the back of us, as I suspect that, being the main counterpart to France & Germany, we'd be the main blocker of closer integration. Now we're finally out, after 5 years of political chaos, perhaps we can start to look forward.
Having delivered successful change programmes for half of my career and successfully received them operationally for the other half, I am pretty familiar with the impact it can have on individual, group, or organisation. I think you will find that most on here are past the stage you describe on your consultancy course.1609682367191.jpeg

if you take a typical change curve, I think most on here are way past depression, stage 4, many are past acceptance Stage 5 and are actively looking at what the new arrangements and relationship will mean. Stage 6.

My point was, let’s not revisit the past as that will certainly send Some of us us back to stage 2 and stage 4. No matter what your beliefs about the EU are, best we all concentrate on stage 6.
 
Last edited:
I‘m the same. That phrase, her speech, did it for me, it weakened a natural emotional attachment to country. Theresa May more than anyone increased my antipathy to Brexit and, to be honest, some people who support it, the lies they tell are difficult to stomach.

Time is a great healer although I would get that timepiece sorted out.


back_in_time.gif


 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.