BlueRockape
Well-Known Member
As predicted
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Premier League clubs vote against 5 subs per match in 20/21
- Thread starter Gareth Barry Conlon
- Start date
As predicted
M
M
mat
Guest
I wonder why the PL decided to retain the 3 subs rule...?
M
M
mat
Guest
Won’t be long before we found out which way everyone voted.11 of the 20 clubs voted to go back to 3 subs.
No shock this once Neville let us known and the media saying it benefits the clubs with big squads with quality like Man City!
But some of these clubs haven’t thought it through again make no mistake there thought would of been o our squad and how it could benefit us not them where they could refresh nearly half there squad after we have run them ragged! I guarantee the scousers wouldn’t of voted for 5 subs.
But some of these clubs haven’t thought it through again make no mistake there thought would of been o our squad and how it could benefit us not them where they could refresh nearly half there squad after we have run them ragged! I guarantee the scousers wouldn’t of voted for 5 subs.
M
M
mat
Guest
They probably voted against agreeing to FIFA rules for VAR as well.No shock this once Neville let us known and the media saying it benefits the clubs with big squads with quality like Man City!
But some of these clubs haven’t thought it through again make no mistake there thought would of been o our squad and how it could benefit us not them where they could refresh nearly half there squad after we have run them ragged! I guarantee the scousers wouldn’t of voted for 5 subs.
I will make a prediction that by mid-December, the clubs who voted for this will be regretting it dearly and Sean Dyche will be complaining that he's only got 4 subs and 3 are goalkeepers.
This was a system set up to stop injuries, and a predictably stupid part of the media instantly jumped on it being better for the top clubs as they can play 16 great players a match instead of 14, but completely ignored the fact that the smaller clubs will be wiped out by 4 or 5 injuries, and the big clubs will be OK.
Villa, Burnley, Leeds, Wolves, West Brom, Fulham Palace, Sheff. United...they'll be destroyed by a few injuries.
This was a system set up to stop injuries, and a predictably stupid part of the media instantly jumped on it being better for the top clubs as they can play 16 great players a match instead of 14, but completely ignored the fact that the smaller clubs will be wiped out by 4 or 5 injuries, and the big clubs will be OK.
Villa, Burnley, Leeds, Wolves, West Brom, Fulham Palace, Sheff. United...they'll be destroyed by a few injuries.
Last edited:
PannickAtTheDisco
Well-Known Member
with a picture of us as the headline on the Beeb.
kaz7
Well-Known Member
Ha predictable,the other clubs are in how to stop city mode and not what might be best for them in a very busy seasonwith a picture of us as the headline on the Beeb.
blueparrot
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 7 Jun 2012
- Messages
- 29,491
Doubt City crossed th minds of most clubs, would expect some of those it did voted the same way as us. Not everything is about plotting against us, if you think it is not much point following football anymore.Ha predictable,the other clubs are in how to stop city mode and not what might be best for them in a very busy season