Problem is the people running var are just as useless as the clown on the pitch.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Premier League Games 30/April, 1/2/3 May
- Thread starter kaz7
- Start date
All of it. As I said, it's your opinion, which is fine, but don't try and dress it up as "facts".Which bit are you disagreeing with?
asgoodasitgets
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 31 Jul 2009
- Messages
- 1,447
- Team supported
- Team America World Police
OK , different scenario.No, lying on the floor isn't making a challenge is it?
A 50/50 header, player falls over, legs akimbo and an opposing player runs on to his studs .
Still a red ?
You're right most of us would be screaming blue murder because we're City fans, in a game without vested interest we can be more objective. He wins the ball admittedly he catches Vardy the noted play actor but certainly not on the shin side of leg he wasn't hurt to be fair and the correct decision was a yellow card in my opinion at least.
I don't think you are being objective. You're hung up on the fact he got the ball first when it doesn't matter, and it never has mattered in whether a tackle is a foul or not.
And the fact you refer to Vardy as "the noted play actor" when a 17 stone giant's just gone straight through his ankle studs up shows up the fact you're not being objective.
OK , different scenario.
A 50/50 header, player falls over, legs akimbo and an opposing player runs on to his studs .
Still a red ?
No, it's not a challenge on the ball if he's falling over.
PragueBlue
Well-Known Member
If it causes an injury, then it has endangered him. You keep calling it a lunge. It looked more like a stretch to me.You don't remember correctly, he stepped on someones foot only. It's not endangering a player like lunging into his ankle.
Anyway, we're never going to agree, so I'll leave it there.
kaz7
Well-Known Member
Who is time keeping ?
asahartford1
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 15 Nov 2016
- Messages
- 8,833
Unlucky red for me.
Don't think carry was hurt at all.
He didn't have to go off the field after attention.
It's a fashion decision.
And he was sent off for denying a goal scoring opportunity
Don't think carry was hurt at all.
He didn't have to go off the field after attention.
It's a fashion decision.
And he was sent off for denying a goal scoring opportunity
All of it. As I said, it's your opinion, which is fine, but don't try and dress it up as "facts".
That's the thing though, it's not an opinion. We have video evidence, it's not an opinion that he went into his ankle and ended up his shin. It's not an opinion that he had his studs up, or that he lunged for the ball.
Most posters disagree with you, you're not the footballing oracle you think you are.You don't remember correctly, he stepped on someones foot only. It's not endangering a player like lunging into his ankle.