Premier League Games 30/April, 1/2/3 May

Which bit are you disagreeing with?

The facts are pretty simple, the rules are pretty straight forward.

Are you disagreeing that he lunged for the ball? Are you disagreeing that he made contact with Vardy's ankle? That his studs were up?
The Premier League have confirmed the red card was for denial of a goal scoring opportunity.

Hmmm, seems that your interpretation is at odds with the referee and VAR, wasn't given for any of the reasons you have stated as facts...

It makes their decision even more ridiculous!
 
The Premier League have confirmed the red card was for denial of a goal scoring opportunity.

Hmmm, seems that your interpretation is at odds with the referee and VAR, wasn't given for any of the reasons you have stated as facts...

It makes their decision even more ridiculous!

He could have given it for either. It can't be DOGSO if it's not a foul, so you and the rest of the clowns pretending it's a good tackle because he won the ball are as wrong as ever.
 
I think you have edited my reply, so by that logic, we can edit eveyones replies to suit.

No? I replied to one part of your reply that was obviously nonsense. A player carrying on after a bad tackle doesn't mean it shouldn't be a red, which is what you said.
 
Anyway, enjoy the game lads, pretending like it's still the glory years of the 1970's and anything that didn't break a leg was a clean tackle.
 
Would have been furious if it was us, but I can see why. Vestergaard got the ball, but he did not knock it far enough to prevent a goal scoring if he had not prevented Vardy from moving toward the ball, hence he prevented a goal scoring opportunity.
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.