As I say there has to be a doubt option, they don’t have to be 100% accurate all the time, they’re not anyway but they shouldn’t aim for 100% accuracy as they won’t get it.I know, i was fuming, but it's not VAR, It's the rules.
they just need to change the ruling and then VAR can implement it
- it will always be the way forward as refs alone make far more mistakes
As I say there has to be a doubt option, they don’t have to be 100% accurate all the time, they’re not anyway but they shouldn’t aim for 100% accuracy as they won’t get it.
If there’s a doubt, benefit of doubt goes to the attacker.
There should be a linesman’s call option for tight offsides too.
That’s a good point.Agree mate, problem is if you bring a doubt element into it, the opposing side will cry corruption
That’s a good point.
I’d honestly just bin it and go back to just goal line tech.
Agree mate, problem is if you bring a doubt element into it, the opposing side will cry corruption
Could there not be like an amount of distance the player can be offside? Say half an inch? So if the linesman gives it and he is then it’s offside but if they don’t and a goals scored its given? ...As I’m writing this I’m seeing its potential for corruptionThat’s a good point.
I’d honestly just bin it and go back to just goal line tech.
no. Sod that. Refs forced into making blind guesses, players scoring from ‘miles’ offside and the amount of players winning penalty’s from diving was a joke.
At least with VAR it can look at ways to improve and slowly get right.
Just a ref and couple of linos couldn’t improve.
Times up on that, if it s not right bin it or work tirelessly to make it so. it s okay for the top clubs they lose their grip on europe for one season......but for the lesser clubs they will get relegated on such decisions. That is- NOT RIGHT!
surely have to weigh up
are decisions ie: offside, penalty's etc more right now than they was before... the answer is yes