mcfcryan said:Anyone uploaded it yet?
hope anyone can get post a link
mcfcryan said:Anyone uploaded it yet?
Blue Is the Opposite of Blue said:karen7 said:Spoiler: City win.
Blue Is the Opposite of Blue said:Can't really disagree with any of that so I'll concede.@BluePhil8 said:Complete and utter bull shit.Blue Is the Opposite of Blue said:Mourinho did what he could with the players he had (imagine having to rely on Ba, Torres and Eto'o). Things will be different this season.
At Real Madrid he had Cristiano Ronaldo, Ozil, Kaka, Benzema and Di Maria and they still played counter attacking dull football. He won one League title there in 3 seasons. Against Barcelona he would play Pepe in central midfield to kick Messi to death.
Last season he had Hazard, Mata and Oscar but ended up fucking Mata off for defensive wingers like Willian.
Mourinho just can't win with an attacking philosophy. His ethos is to create an us against the world mentality where the players will run through walls for each other. He could sign Messi tommorow and I wouldn't shit myself because he wouldn't be able to find a place for him.
I'm just unfortunately confident that Chelsea are going to pip us to the title is all.
They only showed one goal for the 6-3 because the images for that game are owned by BT Sports and can't show any more than they did.karen7 said:I have watched the first 45mins and it seems ok to me except the 6-3 win against the arses mentioned in a couple of secs and only showed yaya's penalty,that is odd given it was one of the games of the season
In answer to which other goals of ours they could have shown,well there was 6 there for a start and 3 in the derby at home they didn't show
Certainly they are not making much of the thrashings we handed out
I didnt really expect much more from sky
Blue Is the Opposite of Blue said:They only showed one goal for the 6-3 because the images for that game are owned by BT Sports and can't show any more than they did.karen7 said:I have watched the first 45mins and it seems ok to me except the 6-3 win against the arses mentioned in a couple of secs and only showed yaya's penalty,that is odd given it was one of the games of the season
In answer to which other goals of ours they could have shown,well there was 6 there for a start and 3 in the derby at home they didn't show
Certainly they are not making much of the thrashings we handed out
I didnt really expect much more from sky
And they did that with a number games, not just ours. They only showed one Liverpool goal against Arsenal in the 5-1 win.
karen7 said:Blue Is the Opposite of Blue said:They only showed one goal for the 6-3 because the images for that game are owned by BT Sports and can't show any more than they did.karen7 said:I have watched the first 45mins and it seems ok to me except the 6-3 win against the arses mentioned in a couple of secs and only showed yaya's penalty,that is odd given it was one of the games of the season
In answer to which other goals of ours they could have shown,well there was 6 there for a start and 3 in the derby at home they didn't show
Certainly they are not making much of the thrashings we handed out
I didnt really expect much more from sky
And they did that with a number games, not just ours. They only showed one Liverpool goal against Arsenal in the 5-1 win.
I did expect more to be made of our huge wins but overall it was an ok review,like i said i don't expect any more from sky.I am in the bias rather than full on agenda camp.
I have decided that i will ignore the media this coming season,it's a waste of energy
But reading opposing points of view is a good thing to do. Some articles are plain bitter, like that "match review" about our friendly against Dundee, but most of the articles about us which take a negative slant aren't bitter or rooted in bias. Some are totally fair. They don't always paint us in a good light, but we're not a perfect club. I'm yet to see any newspaper hit us hard in the way some of our own fans have about the horrendous ticket price increases for the Liverpool & Stoke games. It's good to read other perspectives even when you don't agree with them.karen7 said:I have decided that i will ignore the media this coming season,it's a waste of energy
Blue Is the Opposite of Blue said:For those complaining, which Liverpool goals would you have replaced with ours? Because I can't think of any.
Blue Is the Opposite of Blue said:But reading opposing points of view is a good thing to do. Some articles are plain bitter, like that "match review" about our friendly against Dundee, but most of the articles about us which take a negative slant aren't bitter or rooted in bias. Some are totally fair. They don't always paint us in a good light, but we're not a perfect club. I'm yet to see any newspaper hit us hard in the way some of our own fans have about the horrendous ticket price increases for the Liverpool & Stoke games. It's good to read other perspectives even when you don't agree with them.karen7 said:I have decided that i will ignore the media this coming season,it's a waste of energy