Premier League Years 2013/14

[Blue Is the Opposite of Blue]

I have watched the first 45mins and it seems ok to me except the 6-3 win against the arses mentioned in a couple of secs and only showed yaya's penalty,that is odd given it was one of the games of the season
In answer to which other goals of ours they could have shown,well there was 6 there for a start and 3 in the derby at home they didn't show
Certainly they are not making much of the thrashings we handed out
I didnt really expect much more from sky

They only showed one goal for the 6-3 because the images for that game are owned by BT Sports and can't show any more than they did.

And they did that with a number games, not just ours. They only showed one Liverpool goal against Arsenal in the 5-1 win.

They showed 2 goals of the Spurs 5-1, that was on BT. Showed 3 goals of the Merseyside derby at Goodison, also on BT...

Showing one of the 7 against Norwich was poor, think they showed all 4 of United's in Gigg's first match against the same team. Mentioning that Liverpool had a wrongfully disallowed goal against us at the Etihad was poor, as it wasn't a disallowed goal at all just a wrong offside decision.

The Fulham game, with us 2-0 up then 2-2, then winning 4-2 would have been nice to see, especially with goals like Yaya's free kick, Navas' go ahead goal or Jimmy's after THAT Negredo pass, ah well I preferred seeing Liverpool beat West Ham with an O.G. and two deflected shots anyway...

I will concede to you the point about BT Sport - that was just something I read on here a few pages back and took as gospel. My mistake. Although, I think the first game after Moyes' departure was always going to feature strongly because it was a day of optimism and hope for United. While I would have also enjoyed watching more of the Norwich 7-0 game, to Sky it's probably just a routine home win.

You say that about the Fulham game, but I'm sure Liverpool fans would have enjoyed seeing their 5-3 win over Stoke, or their 4-3 win over Swansea, as much as you wanted to see us beat Fulham 4-2. Neither games were shown. I don't remember the fantastic 4-3 between Aston Villa and West Brom being shown either.

 

[Blue Is the Opposite of Blue]

The daily mirror the last 6 days has had a double page rag section EVERY day,several one pages for chelsea and same for liverpool
Not a single word or even just the friendly scores about city except alf's injury
everyone else's friendlies have had a write up,explain that for me please

<a class="postlink" href="http://www.mirror.co.uk/sport/football/news/manchester-city-ease-4-1-friendly-3906338" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;">http://www.mirror.co.uk/sport/football/ ... ly-3906338</a>

<a class="postlink" href="http://www.mirror.co.uk/sport/football/news/live-sporting-kansas-city-v-3904151" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;">http://www.mirror.co.uk/sport/football/ ... -v-3904151</a>

<a class="postlink" href="http://www.mirror.co.uk/sport/football/news/pre-season-friendlies-premier-league-2014-15-3787408" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;">http://www.mirror.co.uk/sport/football/ ... 15-3787408</a>

<a class="postlink" href="http://www.mirror.co.uk/sport/football/watch-live-manchester-city-vs-3850798" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;">http://www.mirror.co.uk/sport/football/ ... vs-3850798</a>

And just for fun:

<a class="postlink" href="http://www.mirror.co.uk/sport/row-zed/manchester-united-fan-managed-define-3905313" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;">http://www.mirror.co.uk/sport/row-zed/m ... ne-3905313</a>

I'm not clicking onto those,i am talking about the newspaper i have had in my hands this last week

It's the same company.

 

[pudge]

They only showed one goal for the 6-3 because the images for that game are owned by BT Sports and can't show any more than they did.

And they did that with a number games, not just ours. They only showed one Liverpool goal against Arsenal in the 5-1 win.

They showed 2 goals of the Spurs 5-1, that was on BT. Showed 3 goals of the Merseyside derby at Goodison, also on BT...

Showing one of the 7 against Norwich was poor, think they showed all 4 of United's in Gigg's first match against the same team. Mentioning that Liverpool had a wrongfully disallowed goal against us at the Etihad was poor, as it wasn't a disallowed goal at all just a wrong offside decision.

The Fulham game, with us 2-0 up then 2-2, then winning 4-2 would have been nice to see, especially with goals like Yaya's free kick, Navas' go ahead goal or Jimmy's after THAT Negredo pass, ah well I preferred seeing Liverpool beat West Ham with an O.G. and two deflected shots anyway...

I will concede to you the point about BT Sport - that was just something I read on here a few pages back and took as gospel. My mistake. Although, I think the first game after Moyes' departure was always going to feature strongly because it was a day of optimism and hope for United. While I would have also enjoyed watching more of the Norwich 7-0 game, to Sky it's probably just a routine home win.

You say that about the Fulham game, but I'm sure Liverpool fans would have enjoyed seeing their 5-3 win over Stoke, or their 4-3 win over Swansea, as much as you wanted to see us beat Fulham 4-2. Neither games were shown. I don't remember the fantastic 4-3 between Aston Villa and West Brom being shown either.

You asked what goals of ours would some have preferred to have seen over those shown of Liverpool.

3 in that Fulham game over a West Ham O.G. and 2 deflected shots answer that question you pleaded to be answered 3 times.

Liverpool's 5-1 over Norwich was rather routine as well, saw all but 1 of them though..

You've "conceded" to two separate points, by two separate posters, after YOU brought them up. Perhaps it's time to stop posting for the sake of it, which is what that comes across as.

 

[Blue Is the Opposite of Blue]

They showed 2 goals of the Spurs 5-1, that was on BT. Showed 3 goals of the Merseyside derby at Goodison, also on BT...

Showing one of the 7 against Norwich was poor, think they showed all 4 of United's in Gigg's first match against the same team. Mentioning that Liverpool had a wrongfully disallowed goal against us at the Etihad was poor, as it wasn't a disallowed goal at all just a wrong offside decision.

The Fulham game, with us 2-0 up then 2-2, then winning 4-2 would have been nice to see, especially with goals like Yaya's free kick, Navas' go ahead goal or Jimmy's after THAT Negredo pass, ah well I preferred seeing Liverpool beat West Ham with an O.G. and two deflected shots anyway...

I will concede to you the point about BT Sport - that was just something I read on here a few pages back and took as gospel. My mistake. Although, I think the first game after Moyes' departure was always going to feature strongly because it was a day of optimism and hope for United. While I would have also enjoyed watching more of the Norwich 7-0 game, to Sky it's probably just a routine home win.

You say that about the Fulham game, but I'm sure Liverpool fans would have enjoyed seeing their 5-3 win over Stoke, or their 4-3 win over Swansea, as much as you wanted to see us beat Fulham 4-2. Neither games were shown. I don't remember the fantastic 4-3 between Aston Villa and West Brom being shown either.

You asked what goals of ours would some have preferred to have seen over those shown of Liverpool.

3 in that Fulham game over a West Ham O.G. and 2 deflected shots answer that question you pleaded to be answered 3 times.

Liverpool's 5-1 over Norwich was rather routine as well, saw all but 1 of them though..

I think Suarez scoring one of the most phenomenal hat-tricks the Premier League has ever seen deserves to be called more than a "routine win". They were TV friendly goals of the highest standard and deserved to be shown.

 

[kaz7]

<a class="postlink" href="http://www.mirror.co.uk/sport/football/news/manchester-city-ease-4-1-friendly-3906338" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;">http://www.mirror.co.uk/sport/football/ ... ly-3906338</a>

<a class="postlink" href="http://www.mirror.co.uk/sport/football/news/live-sporting-kansas-city-v-3904151" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;">http://www.mirror.co.uk/sport/football/ ... -v-3904151</a>

<a class="postlink" href="http://www.mirror.co.uk/sport/football/news/pre-season-friendlies-premier-league-2014-15-3787408" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;">http://www.mirror.co.uk/sport/football/ ... 15-3787408</a>

<a class="postlink" href="http://www.mirror.co.uk/sport/football/watch-live-manchester-city-vs-3850798" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;">http://www.mirror.co.uk/sport/football/ ... vs-3850798</a>

And just for fun:

<a class="postlink" href="http://www.mirror.co.uk/sport/row-zed/manchester-united-fan-managed-define-3905313" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;">http://www.mirror.co.uk/sport/row-zed/m ... ne-3905313</a>

I'm not clicking onto those,i am talking about the newspaper i have had in my hands this last week

It's the same company.

As i said the newspaper excluded any mention of us in favour of the rags in particular
If you didn't know the champions of england were on tour in the USA you would never know after reading the paper,not everyone gets their news online

 

[pudge]

I will concede to you the point about BT Sport - that was just something I read on here a few pages back and took as gospel. My mistake. Although, I think the first game after Moyes' departure was always going to feature strongly because it was a day of optimism and hope for United. While I would have also enjoyed watching more of the Norwich 7-0 game, to Sky it's probably just a routine home win.

You say that about the Fulham game, but I'm sure Liverpool fans would have enjoyed seeing their 5-3 win over Stoke, or their 4-3 win over Swansea, as much as you wanted to see us beat Fulham 4-2. Neither games were shown. I don't remember the fantastic 4-3 between Aston Villa and West Brom being shown either.

You asked what goals of ours would some have preferred to have seen over those shown of Liverpool.

3 in that Fulham game over a West Ham O.G. and 2 deflected shots answer that question you pleaded to be answered 3 times.

Liverpool's 5-1 over Norwich was rather routine as well, saw all but 1 of them though..

I think Suarez scoring one of the most phenomenal hat-tricks the Premier League has ever seen deserves to be called more than a "routine win". They were TV friendly goals of the highest standard and deserved to be shown.

[bigimg]http://i.imgur.com/xBA6BQ0.gif[/bigimg]

[video]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UDemVW3NKYM[/video]

They're TV nasties I take it

 

[Blue Is the Opposite of Blue]

You asked what goals of ours would some have preferred to have seen over those shown of Liverpool.

3 in that Fulham game over a West Ham O.G. and 2 deflected shots answer that question you pleaded to be answered 3 times.

Liverpool's 5-1 over Norwich was rather routine as well, saw all but 1 of them though..

I think Suarez scoring one of the most phenomenal hat-tricks the Premier League has ever seen deserves to be called more than a "routine win". They were TV friendly goals of the highest standard and deserved to be shown.

[bigimg]http://i.imgur.com/xBA6BQ0.gif[/bigimg]

[video]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UDemVW3NKYM[/video]

They're TV nasties I take it

Not exactly.

But I think, if you're a neutral, you're going to enjoy seeing Suarez lump one in from 40-yards on the volley rather than Yaya's free-kick, you know? And if it's part of a Suarez set, you pretty much get the lot anyway.

 

[pudge]

I think Suarez scoring one of the most phenomenal hat-tricks the Premier League has ever seen deserves to be called more than a "routine win". They were TV friendly goals of the highest standard and deserved to be shown.

[bigimg]http://i.imgur.com/xBA6BQ0.gif[/bigimg]

[video]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UDemVW3NKYM[/video]

They're TV nasties I take it

Not exactly.

But I think, if you're a neutral, you're going to enjoy seeing Suarez lump one in from 40-yards on the volley rather than Yaya's free-kick, you know? And if it's part of a Suarez set, you pretty much get the lot anyway.

But when it's a Yaya hat trick and they show him "lump one" in from 30 odd yards, that's all you're gonna get from the set?

I see. Again, I answered the question were seemed desperate to get answered and you've seemingly moved the goal posts; but you have no motive to do so, clearly...

 

[HelloCity]

I take it Blue Is the Opposite of Blue supports Liverpool?

Bizarre how a non City fan would spend so much time here.

 

[Blue Is the Opposite of Blue]

I take it Blue Is the Opposite of Blue supports Liverpool?

Bizarre how a non City fan would spend so much time here.

No no, I'm a Blue.