Raheem Sterling and Gomez - "bust up" at England camp

Sorry, I’ll get pelters for this I know and I won’t harp on anymore - but Southgate has absolutely nothing to apologise for. Why? Because he’s the manager and he can do whatever the hell he likes.
He could drop Kane for the Euros.
He could decide never to player Sterling again for whatever reason.
He could not play any Hammers players ever.
He could play Pickford up front.

he is the appointed England manager , he must do what he feels is best. When that is taken away from him by media and fan pressure then I would lose a lot of respect for the game. It’s his neck on the line, for us fans all we should care about is performances and results - only when they are not happening should we slag him off.
If I was England manager, no way would I have omitted Sterling from the squad, I would also have a different line up and formation, but I’m not the bloody manager so it’s easy for us lot to say what he should or shouldn’t be doing but end of the day he must do and choose what he feels best.


as a neutral mate do you think Gomez should have been booed?
 
just opinions mate, i just think we would all go mad if it was the other way around. i also think that if we had won on Sunday no one would be arsed!

You need to look at the sterling scenario on its own merit and so far you haven't done that. Once you have, you will then understand why people have reacted in the manner they have.

It's the ability to recognise a cuñt and if the situation was reversed the response would be fitting with that required for a cuñt.

Sterling is not a cuñt. It's as simple as that.
 
Sorry, I’ll get pelters for this I know and I won’t harp on anymore - but Southgate has absolutely nothing to apologise for. Why? Because he’s the manager and he can do whatever the hell he likes.
He could drop Kane for the Euros.
He could decide never to player Sterling again for whatever reason.
He could not play any Hammers players ever.
He could play Pickford up front.

he is the appointed England manager , he must do what he feels is best. When that is taken away from him by media and fan pressure then I would lose a lot of respect for the game. It’s his neck on the line, for us fans all we should care about is performances and results - only when they are not happening should we slag him off.
If I was England manager, no way would I have omitted Sterling from the squad, I would also have a different line up and formation, but I’m not the bloody manager so it’s easy for us lot to say what he should or shouldn’t be doing but end of the day he must do and choose what he feels best.

Now a certified WUM in my book.
 
as a neutral mate do you think Gomez should have been booed?

Probably most England fans are neutral and don't follow prem league clubs so it's interesting to see and hear their reaction to whole incident, especially the events at Anfield.
 
Behave.

You’re treading very near to the WUM ledge.

Who am i winding up? iv'e been on hear for over 10 years and never had so much as a warning, defo not a WUM mate. i honestly go home and away watching us and have had a season ticket since 1996. All i am saying mate is that Gomez done nothing wrong, and we would go mad if it was the other way around
 
You need to look at the sterling scenario on its own merit and so far you haven't done that. Once you have, you will then understand why people have reacted in the manner they have.

It's the ability to recognise a cuñt and if the situation was reversed the response would be fitting with that required for a cuñt.

Sterling is not a cuñt. It's as simple as that.
i never said that he is, all i said is that Gomez has done nothing wrong (Southgate and the press on the other hand are out of order)
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.