We did okay.
You just know though that if we were signing Bayern Paris or Madrid’s (the top teams in each league) top scorer over the last six years who was 27 years’ old, we’d be looking at over £100m… maybe £90m as he was in the last year of his contract.
It’s like the Bernardo Silva fee banded about. He’s the second best player at the best team in Europe, who’s 28 with three years left on his contract; and City put a £80m price tag on him. That’s too low, other clubs would have him as over £100m easily.
All the way back to selling de Jong for £4m right after he was Netherlands’ best player at the Euros, we have a record of getting modest transfer fees in.
Tell you where we did brilliantly, though: Ferran Torres for £50m. That must have been over double what he was really worth.
I think with Bernardo his personal circumstances have come into that set fee. He’s obviously not 100% happy here but if we set the fee too high it will make him more unhappy and we’re left with a supposed £100m valued footballer who isn’t happy.
Who could buy Sterling for £100m and secondly who would? There’s a reason he’s gone to Chelsea for £55m. Mane is a much better player and went to Bayern for less.
If Chelsea weren’t interested then Sterling would have gone for nothing next year as no one would have bought him.