BlueRockape
Well-Known Member
This thread seems to be 90% accountants
As I have said before it isn't about accounting it's about value for money and for 50 million we can do better
This thread seems to be 90% accountants
Think about this for a minute. Where do they get that money from? You lot, the people who pay for their channels....Think about this for a minute. It's not your money. Sky and BT will pay for it along with Etihad and Nike.
I feel the same way. Makes no difference to fans what he costs, only if he'll improve us.The funny thing is I am one and I couldn't give a flying fuck whether it's 30, 40 or 50m
The funny thing is I am one and I couldn't give a flying fuck whether it's 30, 40 or 50m
Think about this for a minute. Where do they get that money from? You lot, the people who pay for their channels....
So how much less will my sports package cost me next year if the fee is £35m as opposed to £50m? I'm already struggling with the price raise of -€10 after the rags spending spree last year.Think about this for a minute. Where do they get that money from? You lot, the people who pay for their channels....
As I have said before it isn't about accounting it's about value for money and for 50 million we can do better
I'd say he's an improvement on Walcott for sure.