What? It is objectively true that if Chelsea signs Raz they weaken City, if City doesn't get a replacement for Raz... What are you gaging about?You are a real bloody drama queen…
What? It is objectively true that if Chelsea signs Raz they weaken City, if City doesn't get a replacement for Raz... What are you gaging about?You are a real bloody drama queen…
Could we get Werner in a swap?
Windup?Could we get Werner in a swap?
Edited for the avoidance of doubtHe's fucking shit.
This isn't a game though....players don't always have to get better year by yearRegressing at 27. ffs.
Sensible, objective post amidst a huge amount of horseshit that is often posted about Sterling, though he’s never going to fetch £70m in the last year of his contract unfortunately. But as you say any replacement will cost more - but if it has to happen would rather get something now than next year if a new contract isn’t going to happen.It really isn’t. He’s 27, he’s English, he scores on a regular basis, he makes great runs, he draws half a dozen penalties a season and, from a City perspective, he’s possessed of particular attributes that the squad as a whole is severely lacking in, most notably pace - not so much in running with the ball as without it.
There’s always been aspects to his game that I personally think have been somewhat lacking (lack of technique/control when dribbling or finishing), but they’re balanced out by the strengths, and I’d be reluctant to let him go at all - particularly given that the similarly mobile and tenacious Jesus is also heading for the exit - let alone for a paltry £35m. We should be asking double that, even allowing for the fact that prospective buyers might be put off when factoring wages into any deal, because the cost of adequately replacing him will be very expensive