Because he shit himself. He was poor throughout. Hes just a man not up to his profession at the highest of levels.What possible reason could he decide to blow up when Grealish was through on goal after playing the advantage?
After the pass to Jack then?Sky played the stadium audio alongside the clip.... he blew his whistle after he had indicated to play on.
That’s the rules and signals for a ref to do there’s no aiming involvedTwo arms in the air ffs. Now I know you're on the fucking wum. I'm surprised he didn't put two arms in the air and cheer his decision. Jesus.
He played advantage it’s clear on the video he blew to stop City scoring absolutely blatantThe ref never played advantage he blew straight away for the free kick
He booked grealish for kicking the ball away, fine, but didnt book the spurs player for exactly the same thing in the firstYea but there were lots of others where he didnt apply the laws It’s an automatic booking to stop a fk being taken which a spuds palyer did in the first half picked the ball up and stood there
He 100% did NOT.
Sky played the clip with audio.... The foul was committed, Erling recovered and the referee signalled play on. Erling then played Jack through and the ref raised his hand again signalled to play on. The ball was with Jack who was through and then he blew... why?
Your comment could not be more incorrect even if Simon Hooper had written it.
Blows points for free kick
Then blows again for moving ball
If when the foul happens if he was playing advantage he’d have raised two arm and not put the whistle to his mouth
It's right there. It's corruption
No he didn't. He clearly showed that he was playing the advantage.The ref never played advantage he blew straight away for the free kick