Ref Watch

[Churchlawtonblue]

No.

They just apply them as they see fit knowing that regardless of the outcry, it’s all forgot within a day or two anyway so fuck it, give what they want to whoever they want.

Is the correct answer. When they spend 90 seconds adjusting the lines on one decision and then 0 seconds on another, you can only deduce one conclusion.

 

[blueinsa]

Is the correct answer.

Strategic business plans are in place and at stake here so needs must…

 

[Stephen230]

What goal was awarded via this so called tolerance level in that game then?

The Tottenham one.

 

[Silva2021]

I actually have very little issue with the Casemiro offside, he seems of but a fraction.

It is however the fact that it just seems offside from all the other VAR decisions.

You even get the commentators going quiet.

I’m fully in the corrupt camp and using VAR must be a swing of at least 10-15 points.

 

[blueinsa]

The Tottenham one.

Yet Barnes had one chalked off that was no different.

All hid nicely behind some subjective bollox and plenty of gaslighting so they can give what they want to whoever they want to suit.

That aside though I see no reference to pigmol saying they used the tolerance levels you alluded to, hence why I said I’ve never heard of it since it applies to a Rashford goal against Liverpool and then today?

 

[cheekybids]

Yet Barnes had one chalked off that was no different.

All hid nicely behind some subjective bollox and plenty of gaslighting so they can give what they want to whoever they want to suit.

That aside though I see no reference to pigmol saying they used the tolerance levels you alluded to, hence why I said I’ve never heard of it since it applies to a Rashford goal against Liverpool and then today?

When commentators tell you why goals are allowed & you hear it repeated then it’s corruption. It’s not needed when everything is above board, remember when we were told lies about 7 minutes of additional time to justify the Rags late goal & never before had anyone heard it.

 

[Saddleworth2]

But they are all actively looking for new ways to fuck City over.

 

[Stephen230]

Yet Barnes had one chalked off that was no different.

All hid nicely behind some subjective bollox and plenty of gaslighting so they can give what they want to whoever they want to suit.

That aside though I see no reference to pigmol saying they used the tolerance levels you alluded to, hence why I said I’ve never heard of it since it applies to a Rashford goal against Liverpool and then today?

Pgmol don’t announce much publicly, apart from appointments. And certainly not every time a goal is awarded due to the tolerance level being applied.

And you didn’t say you hadn’t heard of it. You said it hadn’t happened and I was gaslighting for simply pointing out that it has, numerous times.

 

[blueinsa]

Pgmol don’t announce much publicly, apart from appointments. And certainly not every time a goal is awarded due to the tolerance level being applied.

And you didn’t say you hadn’t heard of it. You said it hadn’t happened and I was gaslighting for simply pointing out that it has, numerous times.

Sorry but no. Rashford goal was very publicly announced as VAR using new tolerance rules, hence why they have it.

I’ve seen countless goals more onside than that one chalked off since and never have I heard any mention of the same tolerance rule being used or applied.

Until today that is when I read you mentioning it, hence why I told you to stop gaslighting like the media do.

 

[ShedDweller]

I actually have very little issue with the Casemiro offside, he seems of but a fraction.

It is however the fact that it just seems offside from all the other VAR decisions.

You even get the commentators going quiet.

I’m fully in the corrupt camp and using VAR must be a swing of at least 10-15 points.

What?
I've been playing football for most of my life, I'm 58 and have played football at some decent levels for over 50 of those years...
In all that time Luke Shaw would be given 2 feet offside.
Did the laws of the game change recently and I missed it. I'm serious.
Or is just bent?