MillionMilesAway
Well-Known Member
Apparently so - I knew he had been, but thought he'd been moved on already.
It's being reported that it's been planned for a while - this will be 5 years which is probably long enough for anyone.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Ref Watch
- Thread starter Chi-town blues
- Start date
Apparently so - I knew he had been, but thought he'd been moved on already.
It's being reported that it's been planned for a while - this will be 5 years which is probably long enough for anyone.
Chi-town blues
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 5 May 2012
- Messages
- 31,363
Daylight robbery. Investigate that.
halfcenturyup
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 12 Oct 2009
- Messages
- 12,120
When the 'not interfering' rule was brought in, the attacker basically had to be walking away from goal with his hand up to prove he was not part of the move.
Since then we've had First Phase, Second Phase, VAR, keep flag down until ball is touched, no offsides after Lent, every bit of nonsense you can possibly imagine.
Football fans are not stupid, they know when a player is involved with the game and when they're not.
The rule needs to go back to what it was. If you're an attacking player trying to attack then you're interfering with play.
Yep. I have said for some time the rules are being set by referees from the pov of referees, not from players' pov or spectators' pov. What could possibly go wrong?
halfcenturyup
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 12 Oct 2009
- Messages
- 12,120
Daylight robbery. Investigate that.
How do they even determine how high the defender's foot is to adjust for vertical alignment? And as for the forward position of Casemiro's shoulder ..... Well. And the guy at the back in an offside position blocking defenders. Cluster fuck.
The Light Was Yellow Sir
Well-Known Member
Even Neville thought he was offside.Forget Shaw, Casimero is off side.
The lines and dotted fucking line is an absolute joke.
Your own eyes can see he is offside!
Strangely (not) another offside decision, in favour of a red shirted team, with no side on view!
Colin Bells Boots
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 31 May 2016
- Messages
- 17,670
- Team supported
- Manchester City
Even Neville thought he was offside.
Strangely (not) another offside decision, in favour of a red shirted team, with no side on view!
PiGMOL sticking two fingers up to supporters of clubs not on their favoured list - who'd have thought it ?
Chi-town blues
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 5 May 2012
- Messages
- 31,363
The new norm! Ditto shit every week .How do they even determine how high the defender's foot is to adjust for vertical alignment? And as for the forward position of Casemiro's shoulder ..... Well. And the guy at the back in an offside position blocking defenders. Cluster fuck.
Ffs they’re basing their decision on height looking at a 2D frame . How do we know if that vertical line is 90 degree?
halfcenturyup
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 12 Oct 2009
- Messages
- 12,120
Surprised we do t have the technology they used in the world Cup yet. That showed pretty clearly in 3d whether someone was offside.
That was just CGI graphics that looked good. I wouldn't be surprised if it was still based on a referee with a slide rule.
Leeky
Well-Known Member
Rashford now been given goal yesterday when it was quite clear it was going wide until deflected. Their making it up as they go along, similar to Mepham’s OG but we know that wont change.