Ref Watch

[waspish]

Bent decision to rule out the goal, by that logic they should give us more pens as thor gets pulled about in the box every five minutes

For me it’s a foul the bloke on var once he told the referee to look at it it was always going to be disallowed! Now other away around would the bloke on var had of mentioned it to the referee!?

 

[bernard o'silver]

Mitoma scored a ‘try’ not a goal and Welbeck was a yard offside. No choice but to disallow them. Haaland goal was 6 of 1, half a dozen of the other and harshly ruled out on a subjective opinion.

Mitomas try wouldn't have counted either as he didn't ground the ball !!!! :-)

 

[mccity]

For me it’s a foul the bloke on var once he told the referee to look at it it was always going to be disallowed! Now other away around would the bloke on var had of mentioned it to the referee!?

Yes. Why wouldn't they mention it?

 

[crazyg]

Probably not, for the reason I said :)

It’s the same with corners, the bar is always lower for attackers than it is for defenders.

So that you're saying is that the Laws of the Game are not applied evenly, and depends on whether it is the attacker or defender is the miscreant?
Which Law does that come under?

 

[halfcenturyup]

Mitomas try wouldn't have counted either as he didn't ground the ball !!!! :-)

It was knocked-on. No try for that.

 

[Eds]

It was knocked-on. No try for that.

And quite possibly a forward pass before the knock on so restart with a scrum down on the six yard line, City put in

 

[JPAMCR]

And quite possibly a forward pass before the knock on so restart with a scrum down on the six yard line, City put in

If Atwell was the ref he’d have awarded them 4 goals.

 

[meltonblue]

So that you're saying is that the Laws of the Game are not applied evenly, and depends on whether it is the attacker or defender is the miscreant?
Which Law does that come under?

The laws (well, the ones that aren’t binary), aren’t applied evenly, they never have been.

 

[eyalluvitt]

I thought the Haaland one was a bigger pull back. That coupled with the bar being different for attackers than to defenders, particularly if a goal comes from it.

If you flip the clubs around, I’d have been more annoyed had either decision gone against us.

I remember against Palace he smashed a defender to the ground en route to stroke a goal in, 100 times more of a foul than last nights and VAR or the Ref had no issues with it.

 

[exiled-blue]

I remember against Palace he smashed a defender to the ground en route to stroke a goal in, 100 times more of a foul than last nights and VAR or the Ref had no issues with it.

If it's the goal I believe your thinking of, that was the Brighton home game.