Still puzzling over the Cancelo red. Regardless of whether it was or not, does var not have a duty to recommend the referee reviews it, highlight it as a possible missed red card offence? Referee then fully entitled to do as he wishes.
Although our English var system seems to be there specifically to re-referee the game in some instances, with the occasion a referee disagrees with a var challenge few and far between. Yes, it would increase the stoppages in plain slight, but red card offences are fairly rare and can impact a game significantly.
If cancelo gets medical treatment and makes a bigger deal of it (ok he rolled like a 5 year old playing soliders) does the ref then in the pause and the questions from our players then go for a review?
Luckily we overcame it but for other teams going two down could have been three points lost.
Oh what we'd give to have the referees and var audible to us mere paying fans. Would probably do away with half the conspiracy theories overnight too.
Just leaves a bad taste in the mouth, especially following on from Trippier's overturned red which still makes me wince when I see it. Both cases not in control and endangering an opponent, all for a physical game but there's a world cup ruining moment for a player coming along any time now.