Referees’ Performances | 2024/2025

[Bozzie]

Sadly can’t complain about any of today’s bookings. Weak dive, bad foul and a cynical pull back from Stones. Could maybe argue he was slightly lenient towards some of Brentford’s tackles but generally I thought he was ok.

 

[Millwallawayveteran1988]

Sadly can’t complain about any of today’s bookings. Weak dive, bad foul and a cynical pull back from Stones. Could maybe argue he was slightly lenient towards some of Brentford’s tackles but generally I thought he was ok.

Thought he was ok too.

 

[BringBackSwales]

I thought he was ok, but there were several fouls on our players that were clear but not given

 

[chaddblue]

The biggest shock about that referee today was that he was born in 1978

If I'd have had to guess I think I'd have said 1948

 

[bluesteve1964]

Only 2 minutes added time was a bonus. Was expecting 5+. Decent performance.

 

[Gordyola]

The biggest shock about that referee today was that he was born in 1978

If I'd have had to guess I think I'd have said 1948

Bond, Darren Bond

 

[Bluemoon dan]

Only 2 minutes added time was a bonus. Was expecting 5+. Decent performance.

Have to admit, we were the same sat round us. Very unusual for a tight game to have so little injury time at the end. Let's be honest, had the whole situation been reversed we'd have been screaming corruption and conspiracy theories aplenty on here!

 

[BringBackSwales]

Have to admit, we were the same sat round us. Very unusual for a tight game to have so little injury time at the end. Let's be honest, had the whole situation been reversed we'd have been screaming corruption and conspiracy theories aplenty on here!

I think given there were 5 different substitution breaks in the second half 2 mins seemed low, but then he played 4 anyway. So he gave 2 mins for the 45 (4%) and then 2 for the 2 (100%), mathematically surprising

 

[cleavers]

I thought he was ok, but there were several fouls on our players that were clear but not given

So not OK really then, gave them every "foul" that might have been, gave us the only very obvious ones.

 

[cleavers]

I think given there were 5 different substitution breaks in the second half 2 mins seemed low, but then he played 4 anyway. So he gave 2 mins for the 45 (4%) and then 2 for the 2 (100%), mathematically surprising

The "extra" 2 minutes was because there was a near 2 minute stoppage in added on time, but I agree 2 minutes wasn't enough.