Billabillity
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 29 Jun 2016
- Messages
- 65
If a player is past the defence when a through ball is played he must be offside. A player can't be half offside. On or off.
All depends. The bloke who played the cross was miles onside. When he played it to Lalana, he was behind the ball, do also onside. The bit that didn't look right was Lalana was 5 yards offside when the ball went to Firminho. The law states that it's offside if 'the player is trying to gain an advantage'. If Lalana wasn't given offside, then Sergio (or indeed any forward) can just stand on the penalty spot all game and, as long as any cross is played backwards to him, he should never be given offside.Anyone watch on TV and could summarise the linesmans performance. The one closest to South Stand who flagged us offside loads but them hardly at all 2nd half. How accurate were those decisions? Was the Clear chance for them near the end onside?
The ball to Lallana was a backwards pass so not offside - has to be a forward pass for the offside rule to come into play.I am also bemused by the total lack of outrage or coverage of Monaco's first goal in the second leg where the Monaco player was clearly in an offside position blocking Caballero's view of the cross. How the linesman didn't flag for offside is beyond me, even more so when two additional Monaco players were also stood offside, albeit not interfering. The natural inclination of an unbiased official would be to flag surely?
The law states:
You are offside if you are:
On that basis, a clear offside.
- Interfering with an opponent by:
- preventing an opponent from playing or being able to play the ball by clearly obstructing the opponent’s line of vision
The lack of knowledge of the laws of the game is astounding, not one pundit raised the point that Lallana was 5 yards offside when the ball was played. For a professional linesman it is as clear an offside as you are ever likely to get and yet all I hear is that it was a gilt edged chance.
We are being cheated game after game.
If you mean the Lallana miss ? Its not offside because although Lallana is technically in an offside position, he's not actually offside because the ball is isn't played forward, its played backwards, so its a correct decision.Was the Clear chance for them near the end onside?
I am also bemused by the total lack of outrage or coverage of Monaco's first goal in the second leg where the Monaco player was clearly in an offside position blocking Caballero's view of the cross. How the linesman didn't flag for offside is beyond me, even more so when two additional Monaco players were also stood offside, albeit not interfering. The natural inclination of an unbiased official would be to flag surely?
The ball to Lallana was a backwards pass so not offside - has to be a forward pass for the offside rule to come into play.