Thanks :) And food for thought, if you wish to consider...
What if there could be said to be two ways - one could be called the battle of good vs evil, the other the union of heaven and earth.
The former might involve learning (and trying to follow) a set of morals so as to become good and then help God defeat evil. If God reckons you've done a good enough job then you'll get to go to heaven after you die.
The latter might be more akin to asking 'are you suffering? If so, here is a way that you can freely choose (no 'punishment' if you don't) to let go of the binds of 'hell,' so opening more to 'heavenly' qualities (eg love, harmony, joy, beauty etc) that can then come to be known and expressed through earth (the body).
If one then looks back at who put the bible together, it might be an idea to ask whether they were more likely to be invested in the former (eg war) or the latter (eg harmony). Beyond that, it might be suggested that in the former way it would be the church who decided who was best following 'the way', according their understanding; in the latter the populace themselves would come to know how well they were each following 'the way' through their own direct experience.
The other thing that might be suggested is that the good vs evil or union of heaven and earth choice, is not something that is necessarily limited to religion - other versions of this may be found in governent, law, science etc