SpiritofBurnden
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 28 Mar 2010
- Messages
- 1,993
I can remember all the Olympics from Tokyo in 1964, and for decades, we heard the athletes saying the facilities and backing were missing.
If only we could receive support, they said, we could do much better. We didn't win many medals in those days.
Well, now we are seeing the results that decent financial backing can produce, thanks to the national lottery.
I think it's brilliant that an aspiring athlete, whatever their sport, can now realise their true potential.
It may well cost something like £350 million to support them, but I'm all for it.
All those talented athletes with medals in their pockets that are now returning home wouldn't have stood a chance of getting near the podium a few years ago, and now we are the second most successful country on earth.
It's a far cry from the past, when we won one or two gold medals at each games, and long may our success continue.
I've seen every Olympics since Montreal in 1976 and my abiding memory is of commentators desperately trying to find tenuous links between the foreign competitors winning all the medals and GB, in lieu of anyone else for us to cheer. In the LA Olympics, Mary Decker, the golden girl of US track team was married to a British discuss thrower we'd never heard of, so she was as good as one of ours. The Daily Mail even campaigned for South African Zola Budd to get British citizenship prior to those games, because we had no decent female track athletes of our own.