His opposition to the later lockdowns was common knowledge, I said that was 'added details'. In the second article, and in interviews he's done this Summer, he's talking about meetings in Spring 2020.
It was nobody's "baby". To suggest that a policy that was in place in every western country, many before the UK, and that not one member of the cabinet or opposition cabinet actively opposed, was an individual's "baby" is ridiculous. He was simply the man in place at the time.
Remember, that furlough came in just one month after Sajid Javid had quit as chancellor because he wanted to have some independence. Are we really to believe that Sunak, after accepting the post on the basis that he'd defer to Boris & Cummings, was just weeks later truly responsible for one of the biggest spending commitments in UK govt history?