1961_vintage
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 21 Sep 2009
- Messages
- 16,579
They are employed to meet the needs of sky's main customers and they do it very well.
Do you think Chelsea and Arsenal fans love the fact that Carragher, Neville and Richards are on every broadcast?
Just get over it, it’s not a grand conspiracy, they can’t have 20 different commentators to keep every teams fans happy, we get plenty of representation from Micah and Nedum across the BBC and Sky and TNT/BT.
If your reaction to watching that game is that we’ve been hard done by because Carragher commentated on it, you don’t actually like football, just obsessing over the soap opera around it.
It was diabolical today, from the quiet celebration of our goals to the audible groans at Chelsea misses. Fuck em. Let's see where we are at the end of the season. If they come at the king, they best not miss.
I wouldn't mind as much if they were good pundits. Or at the very least decent human beings.they can have 20 different pundits, one from each team, they choose not to, the cunts
If our left back had pulled Salah down the only controversy would've been why a red card wasn't issued for denial of a goalscoring opportunityIf that pull had of been on salah not a single person would’ve blinked an eye
And then hit the mute button - it really is that easyThere is a very easy answer, stop paying for sky and get IPTV
Carragher was very fortunate as a player.According to Carragher our goals are lucky and the Chelsea goals deserved , that is the crux of the matter , he's just another desperate delusional Dipper, if you take a lucky Champs league win away from his career he won f*ck all in the game , he was an average centre back , one club man who didnt have the bottle to leave the Dippers to progress his career when they were shite. If he was a tactical genius he would have gone into management but as Neville proved football managment needs a certain degree of intelligence and character , Carragher & Neville have neither.
I know what they want but if you read the thread it's about rival fans commentating on OUR games.but thats what sky want you daft sod.
they aint stupid,they do their research,their paying public are rags and dippers predominantly,so he plays to the gallery.
it wont change any time soon.
Spitty is the problem - not Neville.Lets face it that is what it is when Caragher and Neville are the pundits.
Cant the club do ANYTHING about it? I mean for us City fans it is aaawwwwful, totally spoils the game unless you switch them off. Rival fans feel the same.
But for me, I think it is down to the club to do something about. These twats are representing our club on the national broadcasters, the first thing potential new City fans (And global fans) hear when the commentary is on City is negativity. All the way through with only cursory acknowledgement of anything positive. Its a totally unfair coverage, even taking into account how everyone is hoping we get beat this year. I can understand that, but its borderline lies that they are telling on our coverage.
The evidence is there for all (Except those blind and deaf to it), we get a shit representation on Sky Sports, cant the club order the PL to actually give us fair coverage? I mean get lawyers involved. Or is that too far?
Could you pause your tv until it’s in sync?Spitty proper pissed me off today. After his disgraceful reaction to our penalty, I tried putting 5live on, but they were 45 seconds behind the sky pictures, so ended up having to mute the game instead. We shouldn’t have to put up with this shit.
I always watch with the mute button pressed, but then I look on a refereeing website and see his views being widely echoed on there - the mud he slings at us is sticking and that is the problem.Use the MUTE button :-D
Micah talks nonsense most of the time and I wish he'd stop "worrying". He "worries" about Cuccurella up against Phil he "worries" about United etc. Really? Stop "worrying" Micah.Is it me or does Micah talk nonsense at times?