robin van persie (continued)

[bobmcfc]

No 'massive city fan' would badmouth the club in public...no matter what they knew

This

What? We do it on here every day

Didn't David makin go on the radio one time ;) ?

 

[Puppet Master Silva]

No 'massive city fan' would badmouth the club in public...no matter what they knew

This

What? We do it on here every day

Didn't realise we logged in and claimed to know how the inside of the club works and slander all of them.

 

[Stoned Rose]

I know Ged, and whilst I can't vouch for anything he says on his twitter account, I do know he works at the Club, has for years actually.

It says he's the former groundsman, any chance he could have a chip on his shoulder ?

Not just a chip, a whole fucking spud by the looks of things.

clearly.

-- Fri Aug 03, 2012 6:17 pm --

Marwood is a fucking leech and needs to go asap.

Cook aka his mate from Nike brought him in and made up some non existent role for him. Now he seems to have authority on our signings and it's really worrying.

It seems Mancini is getting very pissed off with him and that means he's pissing me off.

I imagine whoever is the next CEO will fuck Marwood off straight away. Absolute parasite.

Shocked reading that

Mansour will shit himself when he hears Marvin is pissed off.

 

[Dextersmate]

It says he's the former groundsman, any chance he could have a chip on his shoulder ?

Not just a chip, a whole fucking spud by the looks of things.

clearly.

-- Fri Aug 03, 2012 6:17 pm --

Marwood is a fucking leech and needs to go asap.

Cook aka his mate from Nike brought him in and made up some non existent role for him. Now he seems to have authority on our signings and it's really worrying.

It seems Mancini is getting very pissed off with him and that means he's pissing me off.

I imagine whoever is the next CEO will fuck Marwood off straight away. Absolute parasite.

Shocked reading that

Mansour will shit himself when he hears Marvin is pissed off.

Marwood should have his own thread.

 

[PistonBlue]

I know Ged, and whilst I can't vouch for anything he says on his twitter account, I do know he works at the Club, has for years actually.

It says he's the former groundsman, any chance he could have a chip on his shoulder ?

Lol I'd forgotten about all that stuff with Fergie. Not seen Ged in a while (I used to drink in the same boozer as Mr Coyne). But yeah there could well be some chips involved, plus he is a bit of a loon to be fair.

 

[The Future's Blue]

I feel there's some resentment from a few who feel that we should go balls out to sign RVP and wonder if these same people are thinking we should've got rid of Ade by now?

Be patient, be strong, we are City, we stand tall. It's not about transfers, it's about supporting everything from the top to the bottom, the owner to the tea lady.

If you can't understand that then I suggest you walk away, without looking behind, to a better place that is not the transfer forum.

Peace to you my City friends, may the Blue Charm go with you.

 

[LoveCity]

An update from a better newspaper than the Mirror, isn't it time we ended our interest if he really doesn't want to come here?

<a class="postlink" href="http://www.independent.co.uk/sport/football/transfers/van-persies-reluctance-to-join-city-puts-deal-on-hold-8005894.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;">http://www.independent.co.uk/sport/foot ... 05894.html</a>

Robin van Persie will have to wait longer for his future to be resolved with Manchester City prepared to pay the most, upwards of £20m, for the signature of the Arsenal captain but the player himself still reluctant to join the Premier League champions.

Van Persie, 29 on Monday, has made it clear to Arsenal that his preference of the three clubs who are pursuing him is Juventus and, failing that, Manchester United. Both clubs' valuation of him falls well short of what City are prepared to pay for a player who will be out of contract next summer. While Arsenal do not wish to sell Van Persie to City either, they do want to earn as much as possible from a player who has stated his intention to leave.

It is understood that although the player is adamant that he does not want to go to City, the prospect of not being able to leave at all is a serious concern for him. Following his public refusal to consider a new contract at Arsenal, he feels he cannot play a final season at the club. Whether that would be enough to convince Van Persie to accept a move to City should Arsenal decide to negotiate with them is a decision he will have to make.

For now, however, the £30m valuation placed on him by Arsène Wenger is way in excess of the amount that both Juventus and United are prepared to pay. Both clubs are hopeful that Van Persie sticks to his guns with Arsenal and insists that he joins one of his two first-choice options regardless of what City are prepared to offer.

 

[pudge]

So come past deadline day and he isn't sold, Arsenal will be sweating as their next opportunity of getting a fee albeit at less than they are expecting now will be in January. That is where other clubs will be looking to sign him on a Bosman. Another factor is having player who has no intention in signing a new deal.

If you think they won't receive a bid (that will make them a profit) before this summer's deadline, you're off your rocker.

Juve has set Aresnal a deadline, we are not in the running and the rags are putting bids in just to try and sell season tickets.

Firstly, how do you know we are not in the running.

Secondly, how do you for a fact that United won't mount a serious bid.

And lastly, how do you know that another club won't attempt to sign him later in the window?

 

[Peter Doherty]

An update from a better newspaper than the Mirror, isn't it time we ended our interest if he really doesn't want to come here?

<a class="postlink" href="http://www.independent.co.uk/sport/football/transfers/van-persies-reluctance-to-join-city-puts-deal-on-hold-8005894.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;">http://www.independent.co.uk/sport/foot ... 05894.html</a>

Robin van Persie will have to wait longer for his future to be resolved with Manchester City prepared to pay the most, upwards of £20m, for the signature of the Arsenal captain but the player himself still reluctant to join the Premier League champions.

Van Persie, 29 on Monday, has made it clear to Arsenal that his preference of the three clubs who are pursuing him is Juventus and, failing that, Manchester United. Both clubs' valuation of him falls well short of what City are prepared to pay for a player who will be out of contract next summer. While Arsenal do not wish to sell Van Persie to City either, they do want to earn as much as possible from a player who has stated his intention to leave.

It is understood that although the player is adamant that he does not want to go to City, the prospect of not being able to leave at all is a serious concern for him. Following his public refusal to consider a new contract at Arsenal, he feels he cannot play a final season at the club. Whether that would be enough to convince Van Persie to accept a move to City should Arsenal decide to negotiate with them is a decision he will have to make.

For now, however, the £30m valuation placed on him by Arsène Wenger is way in excess of the amount that both Juventus and United are prepared to pay. Both clubs are hopeful that Van Persie sticks to his guns with Arsenal and insists that he joins one of his two first-choice options regardless of what City are prepared to offer.

Bullshit of Joseph Goebbels proportions. Paraphrased thus: "If he goes to City, it's because he has to...."

 

[pudge]

Are you a mod? As I just deleted that last line in the Sahin Thread?

Nope, but knowing that you deleted it makes me curious as to why?