Blootoof said:Puppet Master Silva said:IanBishopsHaircut said:No 'massive city fan' would badmouth the club in public...no matter what they knew
This
What? We do it on here every day
Didn't David makin go on the radio one time ;) ?
Blootoof said:Puppet Master Silva said:IanBishopsHaircut said:No 'massive city fan' would badmouth the club in public...no matter what they knew
This
What? We do it on here every day
Blootoof said:Puppet Master Silva said:IanBishopsHaircut said:No 'massive city fan' would badmouth the club in public...no matter what they knew
This
What? We do it on here every day
Ovo said:allan harper said:PistonBlue said:I know Ged, and whilst I can't vouch for anything he says on his twitter account, I do know he works at the Club, has for years actually.
It says he's the former groundsman, any chance he could have a chip on his shoulder ?
Not just a chip, a whole fucking spud by the looks of things.
Marvin said:Shocked reading thatmcfcliam said:Marwood is a fucking leech and needs to go asap.
Cook aka his mate from Nike brought him in and made up some non existent role for him. Now he seems to have authority on our signings and it's really worrying.
It seems Mancini is getting very pissed off with him and that means he's pissing me off.
I imagine whoever is the next CEO will fuck Marwood off straight away. Absolute parasite.
Stoned Rose said:Ovo said:allan harper said:It says he's the former groundsman, any chance he could have a chip on his shoulder ?
Not just a chip, a whole fucking spud by the looks of things.
clearly.
-- Fri Aug 03, 2012 6:17 pm --
Marvin said:Shocked reading thatmcfcliam said:Marwood is a fucking leech and needs to go asap.
Cook aka his mate from Nike brought him in and made up some non existent role for him. Now he seems to have authority on our signings and it's really worrying.
It seems Mancini is getting very pissed off with him and that means he's pissing me off.
I imagine whoever is the next CEO will fuck Marwood off straight away. Absolute parasite.
Mansour will shit himself when he hears Marvin is pissed off.
allan harper said:PistonBlue said:allan harper said:
I know Ged, and whilst I can't vouch for anything he says on his twitter account, I do know he works at the Club, has for years actually.
It says he's the former groundsman, any chance he could have a chip on his shoulder ?
Robin van Persie will have to wait longer for his future to be resolved with Manchester City prepared to pay the most, upwards of £20m, for the signature of the Arsenal captain but the player himself still reluctant to join the Premier League champions.
Van Persie, 29 on Monday, has made it clear to Arsenal that his preference of the three clubs who are pursuing him is Juventus and, failing that, Manchester United. Both clubs' valuation of him falls well short of what City are prepared to pay for a player who will be out of contract next summer. While Arsenal do not wish to sell Van Persie to City either, they do want to earn as much as possible from a player who has stated his intention to leave.
It is understood that although the player is adamant that he does not want to go to City, the prospect of not being able to leave at all is a serious concern for him. Following his public refusal to consider a new contract at Arsenal, he feels he cannot play a final season at the club. Whether that would be enough to convince Van Persie to accept a move to City should Arsenal decide to negotiate with them is a decision he will have to make.
For now, however, the £30m valuation placed on him by Arsène Wenger is way in excess of the amount that both Juventus and United are prepared to pay. Both clubs are hopeful that Van Persie sticks to his guns with Arsenal and insists that he joins one of his two first-choice options regardless of what City are prepared to offer.
Firstly, how do you know we are not in the running.carlos92 said:pudge said:If you think they won't receive a bid (that will make them a profit) before this summer's deadline, you're off your rocker.carlos92 said:So come past deadline day and he isn't sold, Arsenal will be sweating as their next opportunity of getting a fee albeit at less than they are expecting now will be in January. That is where other clubs will be looking to sign him on a Bosman. Another factor is having player who has no intention in signing a new deal.
Juve has set Aresnal a deadline, we are not in the running and the rags are putting bids in just to try and sell season tickets.
LoveCity said:An update from a better newspaper than the Mirror, isn't it time we ended our interest if he really doesn't want to come here?
<a class="postlink" href="http://www.independent.co.uk/sport/football/transfers/van-persies-reluctance-to-join-city-puts-deal-on-hold-8005894.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;">http://www.independent.co.uk/sport/foot ... 05894.html</a>
Robin van Persie will have to wait longer for his future to be resolved with Manchester City prepared to pay the most, upwards of £20m, for the signature of the Arsenal captain but the player himself still reluctant to join the Premier League champions.
Van Persie, 29 on Monday, has made it clear to Arsenal that his preference of the three clubs who are pursuing him is Juventus and, failing that, Manchester United. Both clubs' valuation of him falls well short of what City are prepared to pay for a player who will be out of contract next summer. While Arsenal do not wish to sell Van Persie to City either, they do want to earn as much as possible from a player who has stated his intention to leave.
It is understood that although the player is adamant that he does not want to go to City, the prospect of not being able to leave at all is a serious concern for him. Following his public refusal to consider a new contract at Arsenal, he feels he cannot play a final season at the club. Whether that would be enough to convince Van Persie to accept a move to City should Arsenal decide to negotiate with them is a decision he will have to make.
For now, however, the £30m valuation placed on him by Arsène Wenger is way in excess of the amount that both Juventus and United are prepared to pay. Both clubs are hopeful that Van Persie sticks to his guns with Arsenal and insists that he joins one of his two first-choice options regardless of what City are prepared to offer.
Nope, but knowing that you deleted it makes me curious as to why?carlos92 said:Are you a mod? As I just deleted that last line in the Sahin Thread?