Nobody wanted him yesterday.
It's Quiet 18 - Wanna ring the bell?
You’re too serious mate. Lighten up. Everything will be fine. Trust Txiki I only write about football.
forums.bluemoon-mcfc.co.uk
Last edited:
I think that his forward passing is better than you give him credit for but agree that he would not be ready to be our 6 if Rodders was out or being rested. If he had stayed last season he may have got the minutes that went to Rico Lewis and would have been a treble winner rather than having a relegation on his footballing CV.Wasnt ready to play a lone six in the system we had, still isnt. Doesn't have the ball playing chop to control from DM.
Kid is a pure ball winner and recycler at this point. We dont have the game time to invest in training him in it, gonna look a star in some systems just not this one for a few years.
Yeah, i don't think he's terrible at it, but way off the level for what we need in there. Remains to be seen if he could have adapted to the new system mid season as well. Stones, Walker etc all said they struggled with the change , whereas Lewis flourished etc.I think that his forward passing is better than you give him credit for but agree that he would not be ready to be our 6 if Rodders was out or being rested. If he had stayed last season he may have got the minutes that went to Rico Lewis and would have been a treble winner rather than having a relegation on his footballing CV.
The thing that leaps out here is not Lavia but what a monster Rodri is , complete midfielderView attachment 85389
Just on pure numbers you can see why Lavia is a better fit for Liverpool. We say we want a #6 when our #6 is usually a complete midfielder rather than a pure ball winner.
I wouldn't jump to bring him back, but surely that's the difference between between playing for City and playing for Southampton.View attachment 85389
Just on pure numbers you can see why Lavia is a better fit for Liverpool. We say we want a #6 when our #6 is usually a complete midfielder rather than a pure ball winner.
Klopp won absolutely squat and failed to qualify for the Champs leagueKlopp thinks he is good enough for them Arteta thinks he is good enough for them
Ten Peg thinks he will be hood enough for them
Chelsea probably were in mix
But he becomes Raw for City?
You can dislike that ugly teeth dipper bit you say he can't be good for City when he can sign for anyone in top 6?
He'd need to improve almost every metric, and double/triple them in the offensive side at least. Just don't seem them taking another 50m punt when they have Phillips as one already.I wouldn't jump to bring him back, but surely that's the difference between between playing for City and playing for Southampton.
Southampton scored 36 league goals last season - that wipes out the entire first section for Lavia. The areas where he's poor are almost all related to playing in a team that aren't doing much attacking.
First highlighted bit - based on what? The fact he looked good in a really bad team?Lavia would be ahead of both Phillips and Kovacic in the pecking order if he was here. He was fantastic at Southampton last year and will solve a massive part of Liverpool's weakness, which is their midfield.
I find it so weird that the club went as high as £90m on Rice but won't buy Lavia back. For me he's more talented than Rice and has already been in and around the setup.
I agree that he's not stand out enough to bring him right back, but City scored three times as many goals as Southampton, so tripling his offensive stats wouldn't be a surprise.He'd need to improve almost every metric, and double/triple them in the offensive side at least. Just don't seem them taking another 50m punt when they have Phillips as one already.