@BluePhil8
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 4 Jan 2009
- Messages
- 13,425
Yeah but Nasri is better than Lopes so why would we do that?Should have offloaded Nasri this summer and Lopes would probably have stayed
Yeah but Nasri is better than Lopes so why would we do that?Should have offloaded Nasri this summer and Lopes would probably have stayed
Pellegrini is either KFA or just felt like trolling journalists today.
Well its not very clever either way, if the manager doesn't know what's going on, or he's trying to wind journalists up.Pellegrini is either KFA or just felt like trolling journalists today.
Maybe because Nasri looks miserable on the bench and will probably be sold in 1 or 2 years anyway whereas Lopes could have been here for a decade and would be on far less wages.Yeah but Nasri is better than Lopes so why would we do that?
It is a little bit strange, I agree. Pellegrini is not one for winding people up. He'll either say it as it is, or just bat the question away with a straight bat. So I'm inclined to believe that Pellers didn't know exactly what was happening. Or more worryingly, he wasn't aware that Lopes only had one year left on his contract. I don't really get his comments!Well its not very clever either way, if the manager doesn't know what's going on, or he's trying to wind journalists up.
Permanant say press....loan says Pelle
Maybe city have invented another transfer deal....a permanent loan....
City ruining types of transfers now
massively disappointed , come on! We've been hyping Rony up for special things since dennis suarez left us and then this happens. FFS.
Monaco have got a bargain, disappointed to see him go...Perhaps he wasn't good enough or he thought he wasn't good enough
Permanant say press....loan says Pelle
Maybe city have invented another transfer deal....a permanent loan....
City ruining types of transfers now
We paid 12m for Roberts and sold Lopes for 7.3m *facepalm*