Lomas has a lob on said:
City_Sean said:
He hasn't kicked on this season, which is something that worries me. He doesn't neither assist or score.
He is a young player that has been part of an under performing squad.
Everton in general have been awful this season.
Barkley would benfit hugely by playing with a higher calibre of player.
Poor teams are where good young players often stand out. You need only look at John Stones in the same team, who is having a good season.
Lille are torturous to watch at times, but whenever Lopes is on the pitch for them he tends to have a tangible impact, a lasting effect on the game. Something we seldom see from Barkley.
This Barkley hype is making my head hurt. I am not saying he's shit but every time I watch him he seems to do... nothing! He just runs around, plays short passes, and nearly every game makes at least one suicidal pass or loses the ball and puts Everton in trouble. Just like when Jovetic (a vastly superior player) loses the ball for us, it stands out because we're a team renowned for keeping the ball, and Barkley would stick out in the same way.
I just don't see *anything* that matches the price tag attached and the hype from media and fans. Technically he is OK and can dribble pretty well (often with 0 end product), but only in the same way probably 4 or 5 of our academy players can.
McCarthy in the same team always looks better to me and I wouldn't buy him either. People lambast Wilshere because he's a dick, but to me, when actually fit, he is a much better player than Barkley who can play at a high tempo and make his mark on games.